Recent TCPA Robocall-Related Class Action Filings

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is making consumers aware of the following class action lawsuit filings:

Verde Energy USA, Inc.

Class action lawsuit filed against Verde Energy USA, Inc. on March 25, 2020 in United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, Verde Energy USA’s “telemarketing efforts include the use of automated calls to send prerecorded messages.”  The Plaintiff, allegedly, received an “unsolicited, prerecorded phone call on his cellular telephone number from, or on behalf of[,] Defendant [Verde Energy USA].” The Plaintiff, according to the complaint, received the call from telephone number (215) 619-9124, and the call Plaintiff received “used a pre-recorded voice and stated that Defendant [Verde Energy USA] was calling to offer Plaintiff discounted electricity and natural gas.”

Nuvision Federal Credit Union and Denali

Class action lawsuit filed against Nuvision Federal Credit Union and Denali on March 24, 2020 in United Sates District Court, Central District of California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, Defendants Nuvision Federal Credit Union and Denali “regularly called [the Plaintiff’s] cellular telephone number . . . without his consent,” and “[o]n each of the calls, Defendants sought to collect a debt from someone who is not [the Plaintiff].”  Allegedly, even though the Plaintiff told the Defendants that Plaintiff “was not the person Defendants [were] looking for[,] . . . Defendants [Nuvision Federal Credit Union and Denali] continued to harass [the Plaintiff] with calls.” Telephone number (907) 339-2550 was identified in the complaint as a number which contacted the Plaintiff’s cellular telephone.

Coconut Funding, LLC

Class action lawsuit filed against Coconut Funding, LLC on March 25, 2020 in United States District Court, Central District of California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, “Coconut Funding placed a [marketing] robocall to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number.”  The complaint identified (530) 231-5111 as the telephone number which called Plaintiff’s cell phone without the Plaintiff’s “prior express written consent to receive automatic robocalls by using an automatic telephone dialing system.”

Titan Mutual Lending, Inc.

Class action lawsuit filed against Titan Mutual Lending, Inc. on March 24, 2020 in United States District Court, Southern District of California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, Titan Mutual Lending, “between December 29, 2018 and April 25, 2019, . . . placed at least four unsolicited marketing calls, advertising its services to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone.” The complaint identified (619) 382-3846 as the telephone number which contacted Plaintiff’s cell phone “without Plaintiff’s prior express written consent or permission.”

Do You Believe You Are a Victim of Illegal Robocalls, Text Messages, “Junk” Faxes or Telemarketing Sales Calls?

If you have received illegal robocalls, text messages, “junk” faxes or telemarketing sales calls, you may be able to recover at least $500 for each illegal call, text or fax you received and, possibly, as much as $1,500 for each illegal call, text message or facsimile that was made either willfully or knowingly in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

To help evaluate your potential legal claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, please complete KLF’s confidential Robocall Questionnaire or, if you prefer to speak with an attorney, please complete the form above on the right, e-mail [email protected] or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your potential legal rights.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.