Did You Work as an Amazon Delivery Driver for a Delivery Service Partner?

A class action complaint has been filed against Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC, and Amazon Logistics, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) on behalf of all persons who worked as Delivery Service Partner (“DSP”) drivers for Amazon in the United States at any point from June 1, 2018 through the present (the “Class Period”).

The case, Davis v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-09948, was filed on September 7, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and, on behalf of a California subclass, California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law.

If you worked as an Amazon DSP driver at any time since June 1, 2018, contact Kehoe Law Firm to learn more about the allegations and your potential rights.

Amazon DSP Driver Wage and Competition Allegations

The complaint alleges that Amazon has “orchestrated a deliberate and unlawful scheme to suppress the wages of hundreds of thousands of workers across the United States” through its DSP program. It alleges that Amazon abuses its purchase power, or monopsony power, in the labor market for DSP drivers, resulting in lower wages and worse working conditions.

According to the complaint, Amazon’s alleged strategy has two core components: (1) blocking DSP drivers from unionizing, and (2) preventing DSPs from competing with one another for drivers.

• Control over DSPs and drivers: The complaint alleges Amazon maintains near-absolute control over DSPs and their drivers through contractual terms, Program Policies, the Operations Manual, business coaches, hiring and training systems, route assignments, performance goals, ratings, and other infrastructure.
• Sub-competitive wages and working conditions: The complaint alleges DSP drivers’ wages have been artificially constrained below competitive levels and that Amazon’s anticompetitive conduct has allowed it to subject DSP drivers to sub-competitive working conditions and invasive surveillance.
• Union suppression: The complaint alleges Amazon uses anticompetitive tactics to prevent DSP-driver unionization, including contractual restrictions, surveillance, threats and intimidation, termination of relationships with DSPs, and adverse action against drivers.
• No-poach restraints and worker mobility: The complaint alleges Amazon has limited DSPs’ ability to recruit drivers from other DSPs through a no-poach policy and practice, reducing inter-DSP competition for drivers and suppressing wages and other forms of compensation while worsening working conditions.
• Limited alternatives: The complaint alleges DSPs lack reasonable alternative customers and DSP drivers have no reasonable alternatives to their existing jobs.

Who Is Included in the Proposed Class?

The complaint defines the proposed National Class as “All persons who worked as DSP drivers in the United States at any point from June 1, 2018 through the present.” It also proposes a Regional Subclass consisting of class members who worked as DSP drivers in a particular region during the Class Period.

Claims and Relief Sought

The complaint alleges that Amazon violated federal antitrust laws by monopsonizing the DSP Drivers Market and restricting competition among DSPs for drivers, including through an alleged no-poach agreement. It also asserts claims under California antitrust and unfair competition laws.

The plaintiff seeks class certification, injunctive and other relief, and damages, including treble damages.

Amazon DSP Drivers: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you worked as a Delivery Service Partner (“DSP”) driver for Amazon since June 1, 2018, contact Kehoe Law Firm to learn more about the allegations and your potential rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]