A securities class action has been filed against XTI Aerospace, Inc. (“XTI Aerospace” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: XTIA) and certain of its officers on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired XTI Aerospace securities between April 15, 2026 and August 17, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The action, Noalan v. XTI Aerospace, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07378, was filed on August 28, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

If you acquired XTI Aerospace securities during the Class Period and suffered a financial loss, contact Kehoe Law Firm to discuss your legal rights without cost or obligation.

What Does the XTI Aerospace Securities Class Action Allege?

The complaint focuses on XTI Aerospace’s April 15 and May 14, 2026 public statements and SEC filings, including its Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. Among other things, those filings stated that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. The complaint alleges that these and other positive statements were materially false and/or misleading because defendants failed to disclose material adverse information to investors, including that:

• Senior executives had engaged in certain undisclosed activities;
• Those activities required Board review;
• There was reason to doubt the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures;
• As a result, the Company would be unable to timely file its earnings reports; and
• As a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about XTI Aerospace’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

The Internal Review and Form 10-Q Delay

According to the complaint, on August 17, 2026, after the market closed, XTI Aerospace disclosed that it was unable to timely file its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 because it was completing an internal review of its former Chief Executive Officer, who resigned that day, and other related corporate governance matters.

The Company stated that the review was being conducted entirely by a committee of independent directors represented by independent counsel, that a timeline for completion had not yet been determined, and that it was evaluating the implications of the review for disclosures, certifications, controls, and governance matters. XTI Aerospace also stated that at that time, it did not believe the matters under review would affect previously issued financial statements.

The complaint alleges that, on this news, XTI Aerospace’s stock price fell $0.25 per share, or 15.9%, to close at $1.32 per share on August 18, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

Review the XTI Aerospace Securities Class Action Complaint

XTI Aerospace Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired XTI Aerospace securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to discuss their legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 27, 2026. Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by October 27, 2026. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain potential members of the proposed class or to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A securities class action has been filed against Hyliion Holdings Corp. (“Hyliion” or the “Company”) (NYSE American: HYLN) and certain of its officers on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Hyliion common stock between May 12, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The action, Olmeta v. Hyliion Holdings Corp. et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-02375, was filed on August 28, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

If you acquired Hyliion common stock during the Class Period and suffered a financial loss, contact Kehoe Law Firm to discuss your legal rights without cost or obligation.

What Does the Hyliion Securities Class Action Allege?

The complaint concerns Hyliion’s statements about its commercial pipeline and a non-binding letter of intent with VFG Holdings, LLC (“VFG”) involving the potential deployment of up to 250 KARNO Cores over five years.

The complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and omitted material information concerning the credibility and commercial viability of the VFG partnership, including the basis for management’s confidence in VFG and the extent of Hyliion’s evaluation of VFG’s operational capabilities, financial resources, development experience, and ability to perform.

The VFG Partnership and Pelican Way Research Report

According to the complaint, Hyliion announced on May 12, 2026 that it and VFG had entered into a non-binding letter of intent establishing a strategic partnership focused on deploying KARNO Power Modules for next-generation data center applications. The proposed deployments represented approximately $133 million in potential revenue and roughly one-third of Hyliion’s more than $400 million in disclosed potential revenue from non-binding letters of intent.

According to the complaint, on June 23, 2026, Pelican Way Research published a report questioning the credibility of Hyliion’s commercial pipeline, particularly the VFG letter of intent. The report alleged that VFG was recently formed, appeared to have limited staffing, and lacked publicly available evidence of the operational and financial capacity to support the proposed $133 million opportunity.

According to the complaint, Hyliion’s stock price fell from $7.37 per share on June 22, 2026 to $6.10 per share on June 23, 2026, a decline of approximately 17%. The stock price then fell another $1.18 per share, or approximately 19%, to close at $4.92 per share on June 24, 2026.

Review the Hyliion Securities Class Action Complaint

Olmeta v. Hyliion Holdings Corp. et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-02375 — Class Action Complaint

Note: A separate securities class action, Draftz v. Hyliion Holdings Corp. et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-02369, was also filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on August 28, 2026.

Hyliion Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Hyliion securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to discuss their legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 27, 2026. Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by October 27, 2026. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain potential members of the proposed class or to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A securities class action has been filed against Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) and certain of its officers on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Flotek securities between August 3, 2026 and August 17, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby.

Flotek common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FTK.

According to the complaint, Flotek is an energy technology and services company.

What Does the Flotek Securities Class Action Allege?

The action, Bashir v. Flotek Industries, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07285, was filed on August 26, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning Flotek’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose:

• • Concerns about the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) project participants — There were credible reasons to doubt the experience, organization, and financial capacity of the consortium parties for PREPA’s power generation project;
  • Risk to anticipated PREPA revenue — As a result, there was a risk that revenue from the PREPA contract would not be realized; and
  • Allegedly misleading positive statements — As a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about Flotek’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

What Happened to Flotek’s Stock Price?

According to the complaint, on August 17, 2026, Wolfpack Research published a report alleging that Flotek’s $400 million PREPA contract, which the report said accounted for approximately 57% of Flotek’s backlog, had been canceled. The complaint alleges that the report also raised issues concerning the consortium involved in the PREPA project and an allegedly unauthorized signature.

The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price fell $7.17, or 20.01%, to close at $28.66 per share on August 17, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The complaint further alleges that on August 18, 2026, Flotek disclosed that the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico had voted to revoke its approval of the underlying power generation contract and to direct PREPA to terminate the contract. Flotek also disclosed that PREPA had directed consortium parties to hold work on the project while PREPA evaluated the developments. The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price fell another $1.64, or 5.72%, to close at $27.02 per share on August 18, 2026.

According to the complaint, on August 19, 2026, Flotek confirmed that PREPA had delivered formal notice terminating the power purchase and operating agreement, effective immediately. The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price then fell $1.85, or 6.85%, to close at $25.17 per share on August 19, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

Review the Flotek Securities Class Action Complaint

Flotek Investors Who Suffered Losses

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Flotek securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses may complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or contact the firm to discuss potential legal claims.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 26, 2026. Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by October 26, 2026. Investors do not need to serve as lead plaintiff to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A verified stockholder derivative complaint filed August 21, 2026 alleges that certain current and former Block, Inc. (“Block” or the “Company”) (NYSE: XYZ) directors and officers failed to adequately oversee compliance risks involving Cash App and harmed the Company.

The action, Iron Workers Local Union No. 401 v. Dorsey, et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-08765, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California derivatively on behalf of Block against certain current and former directors and executive officers. Block is named as the nominal defendant.

What Claims and Relief Are Asserted?

The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste, as well as alleged violations of Sections 14(a), 10(b), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

On behalf of Block, the plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and disgorgement, and corporate-governance and internal-procedure reforms. The requested reforms include measures intended to prevent and remedy practices that violate federal and state consumer-protection and securities laws and additional audit, compliance, and internal-control procedures.

What Does the Complaint Allege?

The complaint alleges that, from at least 2019 through 2024, Block fiduciaries prioritized Cash App growth over compliance and either failed to adequately oversee compliance or caused Block to engage in allegedly unlawful conduct. Specifically, the complaint alleges that:

• Cash App was designed to make signup and use easy, including through minimal identity-verification requirements, and Block fiduciaries allegedly chose to reduce user “friction” rather than implement compliance measures that could slow user acquisition.
• Block became subject to regulatory actions, fines, civil litigation, and other consequences that the complaint attributes to alleged Cash App compliance failures.
• Certain directors and officers allegedly made or allowed false or misleading statements concerning Block’s compliance practices, risk oversight, and Cash App user metrics.
• Certain insiders allegedly sold more than $1.2 billion of Block stock while possessing material nonpublic information concerning the Company’s compliance regime and changing growth metrics.
• The complaint alleges that false or misleading public statements caused Block to repurchase its own stock at inflated prices, further harming the Company.

Regulatory Actions Cited in the Complaint

The complaint cites several 2025 regulatory matters as part of its allegations concerning harm to Block, including:

• A January 2025 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order requiring Block to pay at least $75 million and up to $120 million in consumer redress, plus a $55 million civil penalty, and to implement specified changes to its practices;
• A January 2025 multistate settlement with state money-transmission regulators requiring an $80 million penalty and compliance measures, including an independent review of Block’s anti-money-laundering program; and
• An April 2025 New York State Department of Financial Services consent order imposing a $40 million civil monetary penalty and requiring an independent monitor to assess Block’s remediation and compliance program.

Review a copy of the Block Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint.

What Is a Stockholder Derivative Action — and Why Does It Matter?

A stockholder derivative action is brought by a stockholder on behalf of the corporation to pursue claims that allegedly belong to the company. Unlike a securities class action seeking direct damages for investors, a derivative action can seek relief for the corporation itself, which can be significant to stockholders. In this case, the complaint seeks monetary recovery for Block as well as reforms to the Company’s governance, compliance, audit, and internal-control procedures designed to protect Block and its stockholders from a recurrence of the alleged misconduct.

Why Should Stockholders Come Forward?

Stockholders can play an important role in derivative litigation by seeking accountability for alleged misconduct and pursuing relief intended to benefit the company. A stockholder serving as a derivative plaintiff acts on behalf of the corporation rather than simply seeking an individual damages payment.

Here, the complaint asks the court to award damages to Block, require restitution and disgorgement from the individual defendants, and direct Block to improve its corporate governance and internal procedures, including additional audit, compliance, and internal-control measures. These forms of relief are intended to benefit the Company and its stockholders by seeking to restore corporate value and strengthen protections against future misconduct.

Block Stockholders: Questions About the Derivative Action?

If you are a current Block stockholder and have questions about the derivative action, your rights as a stockholder, or the role a stockholder may play in derivative litigation, Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is available to discuss the case and evaluate your circumstances.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, send us a message or contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]