Semtech Securities Class Action – SMTC

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of investors of Semtech Corporation (“Semtech” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:SMTC) who purchased or acquired Semtech securities between August 27, 2024 and February 7, 2025 (the “Class Period”).

Semtech Securities Class Action Allegations

On February 20, 2025, a securities class action lawsuit was filed in federal court against Semtech and certain executives alleging violations of the federal securities laws.

According to the complaint, the Semtech Defendants allegedly failed to disclose throughout the Class Period that the Company’s CopperEdge products did not meet the needs of server rack customers or end users, necessitating changes to rack architecture. As a result, CopperEdge sales would not ramp-up during fiscal 2026 and would be lower than anticipated. Consequently, the Defendants’ positive statements regarding the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were, allegedly, materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Semtech Investors: Learn More About Your Legal Options

Investors who purchased or acquired Semtech securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s Securities Questionnaire or send us a message to contact an attorney for a free, no-obligation legal evaluation.

For direct inquiries, Semtech investors should contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., at (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, or [email protected], [email protected].

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE

Investors have until April 22, 2025 to petition the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff. The lead plaintiff typically has the largest financial interest and meets the adequacy and typicality requirements. Investors do not need to serve as lead plaintiff to share in any potential recovery.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Volkswagen Recalls 60,490 VW & Audi Vehicles Over Instrument Panel Display Issue

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is notifying consumers that Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”) has initiated a recall of 60,490 vehicles, including certain Volkswagen and Audi models, due to an instrument panel display issue that may increase the risk of rollaway and crashes.

Affected Volkswagen & Audi Vehicles

The recall impacts the following Volkswagen and Audi vehicles:

  • 2021-2023 Volkswagen ID.4
  • 2022-2023 Audi Q4 e-Tron
  • 2022-2023 Audi Q4 e-Tron Sportback

Issue: Faulty Gear Position Display Increases Rollaway and Crash Risk

According to Volkswagen, under certain circumstance, the “N” gear position may not be displayed on the instrument cluster when it should be. If the correct transmission gear position indicator is not shown and the electronic parking brake is not engaged, the driver may be unaware of the vehicle’s actual shift position, increasing the risk of vehicle rollaway and crashes.

To mitigate risk, Volkswagen advises vehicle owners to confirm the red parking brake indicator light is illuminated before exiting their vehicle to ensure the parking brake is engaged.

Recall Remedy: Free Software Update

Dealers will provide an updated version of the brake control unit software for affected vehicles free of charge. No reimbursement program is planned, as the recalled vehicles are under warranty.

Additional Recall Details

More information about the recall can be found in the following official documents:

How to Check if Your Vehicle Has Been Recalled

To determine if your vehicle is subject to this recall, please click Check for Recalls to easily search vehicles, car seats, tires and other equipment for safety recalls, investigations, complaints and manufacturer communication.

Questions About A Vehicle Defect or Recall?

Vehicle owners and lessess affected by automotive defects or safety recalls are encouraged to contact Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. by sending us a message below or contacting Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. 

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors. We litigate securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Our class action legal services are on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

Supreme Court Backs Whistleblower in E-Rate Fraud Case

In an E-Rate fraud case brought under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) against Wisconsin Bell, the U.S. Supreme Court (“USSC”) recently ruled in favor of Todd Heath (“Heath”), in a significant decision which underscores the role of whistleblowers in exposing E-Rate fraud and enforcing accountability in federally managed funds.

What is the E-Rate Program?

The E-Rate (Education-Rate) program, established by the 1996 Telecommunications Act, helps schools and libraries afford internet and telecom services by drawing from the Universal Service Fund (“Fund”).

Telecom carriers contribute to the Fund, which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company, a nonprofit designated by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to oversee collections and distributions in accordance with FCC regulations.

A key regulation, the “lowest corresponding price” rule, ensures carriers do not charge schools and libraries more than comparable non-residential customers.

Whistleblower Lawsuit Against Wisconsin Bell

Heath, a telecommunications auditor, filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin Bell under the FCA, alleging that the company overcharged schools in violation of this rule and then submitted inflated reimbursement requests to the Fund, thereby defrauding the program.

The FCA imposes civil liability on any person who “knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim” as statutorily defined. 31 U.S.C. §3729(a)(1)(A).

Wisconsin Bell’s Defense & Lower Court Rulings

Wisconsin Bell argued that these reimbursement requests did not qualify as FCA “claims” because the money originated from private carrier contributions rather than the government. However, courts, including the Seventh Circuit, rejected this argument, noting that the government played a direct role in regulating the Fund’s collection and distribution.

Additionally, the government contributed more than $100 million directly from the U.S. Treasury, sourced from enforcement penalties and related actions.

Because these government funds were deposited into and disbursed from the Fund, the courts determined that E-Rate reimbursements qualified as FCA “claims,” allowing Heath’s lawsuit to proceed.

To read the USSC opinion, Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel., click E-Rate fraud. 

Impact on Whistleblowers & Fraud Enforcement

The USSC’s decision reinforces the False Claims Act’s role in protecting federal programs and highlights the critical role of whistleblowers in identifying and exposing fraud against the government

Whistleblowers: Know Your Rights 

Kehoe Law Firm is dedicated to protecting whistleblower rights, guiding them through the legal process, and pursuing potential financial rewards for reporting fraud.

For a free, no-obligation evaluation of whistleblower claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

KLF’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a plaintiff-side class action firm, fiercely committed to safeguarding investors and consumers from corporate fraud and misconduct. Nationally recognized, our attorneys have taken the reins as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in high-profile cases, securing over $10 billion in recoveries for institutional and individual investors and consumers. Through relentless class action litigation, we tackle securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations head-on. Beyond that, we champion whistleblowers and fight against data breaches, consumer scams, employment law abuses, retirement plan mismanagement, and deceptive business practices. With a no-nonsense, results-focused approach, we chase down meaningful outcomes—delivering justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. – MRVI

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. (“KLF”) is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of investors of Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (“Maravai LifeSciences,” “Maravai,” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:MRVI).

    Maravai LifeSciences investors who acquired their securities between August 7, 2024 and February 24, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”) and suffered financial losses are encouraged to complete KLF’s Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to reach an attorney for a free, no-obligation legal evaluation of potential claims.

    Delayed Earnings Release and Notification of Late Filing of Its Annual Report 

    On February 25, 2025, Maravai LifeSciences announced that it is postponing its previously announced earnings release and call scheduled for February 25, 2025, as well as that it intends to file a Form 12b-25, Notification of Late Filing, with the SEC and will delay the filing its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

    Maravai LifeSciences also reported that it “. . . requires additional time to complete its year-end financial close process for reasons related primarily to the following items. First, Maravai requires additional time to complete its assessment of a potential non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill associated with its previous acquisition of Alphazyme LLC.”

    Next, Maravai stated that it “. . . requires additional time to assess an error identified during the close process with respect to revenue recognition associated with a single shipment identified in year-end audit procedures that resulted in approximately $3.9 million in revenue being recorded in the final week of the second quarter of 2024 upon shipment when it should have been recorded in the first week of the third quarter of 2024 upon receipt by the customer.”

    The price of Maravai stock dropped more than 20% by the close of trading on February 25, 2025.

    Maravai Reports Certain Financial Statements Should No Longer Be Relied Upon 

    On March 18, 2025, Maravai reported that “[o]n March 17, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company . . . concluded that the Company’s interim financial statements and related disclosures included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2024 . . ., and September 30, 2024 . . ., and as of and for the interim periods ended June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024 . . ., included in its Quarterly Reports for Q2 2024 and Q3 2024, should no longer be relied upon and are being restated . . . as set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 . . ..”

    Restatement to Correct an Error Associated with a Single Shipment

    The restatement, according to Maravai, “. . . primarily corrects an error identified during the year-end financial close process with respect to revenue recognition associated with a single shipment that resulted in approximately $3.9 million in revenue being recorded in the final week of the second quarter of 2024 upon shipment when it should have been recorded in the first week of the third quarter of 2024 upon receipt by the customer.”

    Additionally, Maravai LifeSciences reported that “[i]n connection with these matters, the Company concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level and its internal control over financial reporting was ineffective, due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described in Part II, Item 9A of the 2024 Form 10-K being filed concurrently with [the] Form 8-K.” 

    Maravai LifeSciences Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit 

    On March 3, 2025, a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed against Maravai LifeSciences on behalf of investors who acquired Maravai LifeSciences securities between August 7, 2024 and February 24, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

    According to the class action complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Maravai LifeSciences Defendants allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.

    Allegedly, the Maravai LifeSciences Defendants failed to disclose to investors that Maravai lacked adequate internal controls over financial reporting related to revenue recognition, and as a result, the Company inaccurately recognized revenue on certain transactions during fiscal 2024; its goodwill was overstated; and, consequently, the Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

    Maravai LifeSciences Investors: Learn More About the Securities Investigation and Your Legal Options

    Maravai LifeSciences investors who acquired their securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses may obtain more information about the class action lawsuit and securities investigation by contacting John Kehoe, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801, [email protected], [email protected].

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

    Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

     

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    The Overtime Pay Rule Reversal – What it Means for Workers?

    The overtime pay rule reversal in November 2024 means many workers who would have become eligible for overtime pay under a new Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule are no longer covered.

    The DOL had planned to raise the salary threshold for overtime eligibility, expanding overtime protections to more salaried employees. However, a court decision overturned this rule, keeping the threshold at its lower 2019 level and limiting workers’ access to overtime pay.

    What Happened with the Overtime Pay Rule Reversal?

    The DOL’s 2024 Overtime Rule was set to raise the salary threshold to $43,888 in July 2024 and $58,656 in January 2025, making more salaried workers eligible for overtime pay. However, on November 15, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated this rule, meaning it’s no longer in effect. Now, the threshold is back to $35,568 annually from the 2019 rule.

    This reversal is significant because it affects how many workers qualify for overtime. If you earn less than $35,568, you’re automatically entitled to overtime for hours over 40 per week. But if you earn more, your eligibility depends on your job duties.

    How Does The Overtime Pay Rule Reversal Affect You?

    If you earn above $35,568, your employer might classify you as exempt from overtime, but this isn’t automatic. You must meet specific job duties, such as managing others or making key decisions, to be exempt. For example, if you’re a salaried worker earning $40,000 and your job is mostly routine, you might still be entitled to overtime pay.

    The overtime pay rule reversal could possibly lead to misclassification, where employers wrongly label workers as exempt, denying them overtime.

    What Can You Do if You are Wrongfully Denied Overtime?

    If you think you’re being denied overtime pay, consider taking these steps:

    • Track Your Hours: Document any overtime you work without extra pay and any related communications.
    • Check Your Status: Assess whether your job involves executive, administrative, or professional duties. If not, you might be non-exempt.
    • Consult a Legal Expert About Filing a Claim: Class action lawsuits can help if many workers face similar violations. Contact a law firm which specializes in wage and hour litigation for a legal consultation and, importantly, to ensure compliance with FLSA’s statute of limitations (typically two years, extendable to three for willful violations).

    The DOL’s 2024 Overtime Rule: Context & Legal Challenge

    On April 26, 2024, the DOL published a final rule, “Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees.”

    This rule aimed to update the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by increasing the salary threshold for overtime exemptions. The phased implementation included:

    • Effective July 1, 2024, raising the threshold to $43,888 annually ($844 per week).
    • Effective January 1, 2025, further increasing it to $58,656 annually ($1,128 per week).
    • Additionally, the highly compensated employee threshold was set to rise to $132,964 on July 1, 2024, and $151,164 on January 1, 2025, with automatic updates every three years starting July 1, 2027.

    It was estimated to extend overtime protections to millions of workers, particularly those earning between the previous threshold of $35,568 and the proposed new levels.

    See also: Final Rule: Restoring and Extending Overtime Protections and DOL April 23, 2024 News Release.

    Court Decision and Overtime Pay Rule Reversal

    On November 15, 2024, U.S. District Judge Sean Jordan, Eastern District of Texas, blocked the Biden Administration rule expanding the ability for overtime pay for millions more salaried workers in the United States by ruling that the Department of Labor could not prioritize employee wages over job duties when determining eligibility. Judge Blocks Biden administration’s rule to expand overtime pay for millions.

    This decision meant that the rule, including the July 1, 2024 increase, was effectively nullified retroactively.

    As a result, the DOL reverted to enforcing the 2019 rule’s thresholds:

    • Minimum salary level: $684 per week, equivalent to $35,568 annually.
    • Highly compensated employee threshold: $107,432 annually.

    Lawsuits regarding the 2024 final rule are currently pending in two other federal district courts, and the United States has filed a notice of appeal from the November 15 decision.

    Implications for Workers: Are You Affected?

    The overtime pay rule reversal has significant implications for workers, particularly those earning between $35,568 and $43,888, who would have been automatically eligible for overtime pay under the 2024 rule’s first phase.

    Now, their exemption status depends on meeting certain requirements of the FLSA’s job duties test for executive, administrative, and professional employees, including:

    • Executive Exemption: Managing the enterprise or a department, directing employees, and have the authority to hire and fire other employees.
    • Administrative Exemption: Performing office or non-manual work directly related to management or general business operations, with discretion and independent judgment.
    • Professional Exemption: Work requiring advanced knowledge, typically in a field of science or learning, and involving consistent exercise of discretion.

    For example, a store manager earning $40,000 who primarily handles routine tasks like stocking shelves might not meet these criteria and should be non-exempt, entitled to overtime pay.

    Employers, however, might misclassify such workers as exempt, especially in the confusion following the rule reversal, leading to potential wage theft.

    Misclassification Risks and Wage Theft

    The lower salary threshold increases the risk of misclassification, where employers label workers as exempt without meeting the job duties test.

    Signs of potential misclassification include:

    • Working over 40 hours weekly without additional compensation.
    • Performing routine tasks without managerial or decision-making authority.
    • Employers not tracking hours worked, assuming salaried status exempts overtime requirements.

    Class Action Lawsuits as a Remedy

    Employees can file lawsuits under the FLSA to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime. Successful cases have resulted in significant settlements:

    Have You Been Wrongfully Denied Overtime Pay?

    The overtime pay rule reversal has created uncertainty, potentially leaving workers vulnerable to misclassification and wage theft. Your rights, however, under the FLSA remain protected. If you believe you’ve been wrongly denied overtime pay by your employer, Kehoe Law Firm is here to help.

    Our experienced class action attorneys are dedicated to protecting workers’ rights. For a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

    KLF’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a plaintiff-side class action firm, fiercely committed to safeguarding investors and consumers from corporate fraud and misconduct. Nationally recognized, our attorneys have taken the reins as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in high-profile cases, securing over $10 billion in recoveries for institutional and individual investors and consumers. Through relentless class action litigation, we tackle securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations head-on. Beyond that, we champion whistleblowers and fight against data breaches, consumer scams, employment law abuses, retirement plan mismanagement, and deceptive business practices. With a no-nonsense, results-focused approach, we chase down meaningful outcomes—delivering justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]