2024 Securities Class Action Trends – Key Insights from NERA’s Latest Year in Review

Securities class action trends are dynamic, and the latest report from NERA Economic Consulting, “Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2024 Full-Year Review,” provides a comprehensive look at the evolving landscape of securities litigation.

With more than three decades of data and analysis behind them, the experts at NERA offer fresh insights into the state of securities class actions in 2024, including changes in filing, dismissal, and settlement trends.

Securities Class Action Trends Show A Stable Filing Environment

In 2024, the number of new federal securities class action suits filed remained consistent with the previous year, with 229 cases, mirroring the 229 filings recorded in 2023. This signals that, despite fluctuating market conditions, the filing rate for securities class actions has held steady in recent years.

One notable trend from the report is the concentration of filings within two key sectors: technology and healthcare.

These industries combined accounted for more than half of all securities class actions filed in 2024. This reflects the continued prominence of these sectors in the broader market. Additionally, the report highlights a significant geographical concentration, with 61% of cases filed within the Second and Ninth Circuits, which encompass key financial markets such as New York and California.

New Allegations Shaping Securities Class Action Trends in 2024

The nature of the claims brought forward in 2024’s securities class actions reveals some noteworthy shifts. Of the 229 cases filed, 41% involved allegations related to missed earnings guidance, while only 8% centered around merger-integration issues. This continues the trend of earnings guidance-related cases dominating the landscape.

Perhaps the most striking developments in 2024 were the significant increases in AI- and COVID-related claims. AI-related securities cases more than doubled, with 13 new lawsuits filed in 2024 compared to just a few in the previous year.

Similarly, COVID-related claims saw a 46% jump from 2023, with 19 cases filed. These numbers indicate that evolving market trends, particularly the explosive growth of AI and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, are making their mark on the securities class action space.

On the other hand, the once-bustling arenas of cryptocurrency and SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) litigation have continued their decline. Only eight crypto-related cases and nine SPAC-related suits were filed in 2024, underscoring the fading intensity of legal action in these areas after their peak years.

A Resurgence in Case Resolutions

After a six-year decline, resolutions of securities class actions saw a 17% increase in 2024, with a total of 217 cases resolved. The breakdown of resolutions included 124 dismissals and 93 settlements. Notably, the rise in dismissals was the primary driver behind this increase, particularly cases involving Rule 10b-5, Section 11, and Section 12 claims.

This shift towards dismissals could signal a more challenging litigation environment for plaintiffs, as courts become more selective in the cases they allow to move forward. However, settlements continue to play a significant role in resolving these cases, with aggregate settlements totaling $3.8 billion in 2024. The largest 10 settlements accounted for about 60% of this total, further emphasizing the concentration of financial resolution in a small number of high-profile cases.

Investor Losses and Legal Fees

2024 also saw a sharp rise in investor losses, with the median investor loss reaching $1.76 billion—the highest recorded in the last decade. This reflects the ongoing volatility in the markets and the high stakes involved in these lawsuits.

In parallel, plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses also saw a notable increase, totaling $1.06 billion in 2024, nearly $90 million more than in 2023. The growth in legal fees is a direct result of the complexity and scale of the cases being litigated, particularly those involving large-scale corporate disputes and high investor losses.

The Future of Securities Class Action Trends – Looking Ahead

NERA’s 2024 Full-Year Review provides a snapshot of the current state of securities class action litigation, offering valuable insights into the evolving trends in the industry.

As technology, healthcare, and other emerging sectors continue to dominate the market, we can expect the nature of securities litigation to evolve alongside these changes. The rise of AI-related and COVID-related claims will likely be a continuing theme, while sectors like cryptocurrency and SPACs might see less activity going forward.

For professionals in the field of securities litigation, these findings highlight the importance of staying ahead of the curve in terms of strategy and understanding the dynamics that drive filings and resolutions.

This KLF blog post is designed to present the key points from the NERA report in a way that’s digestible and engaging for readers.

Please click here to see the full NERA report. 

Questions About Securities Class Actions?

Investors and shareholders who have questions about class action lawsuits are encouraged to send us a message or contact John Kehoe, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801, [email protected], [email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. 

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a multidisciplinary, plaintiff–side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors from securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duties, and corporate misconduct.  Combined, the partners at Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. have served as Lead Counsel or Co-Lead Counsel in cases that have recovered more than $10 billion on behalf of institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

GoodRx, PBMs Face New Antitrust Price-Fixing Class Action

GoodRx and PBMs Face Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny 

Independent pharmacies have recently filed lawsuits in several different federal courts, alleging that GoodRx, in collaboration with several pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”),including CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, MedImpact, and Navitus, engaged in practices to suppress reimbursement rates and increase fees for independent pharmacies.

On February 7, 2025, Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. filed such a class action lawsuit on behalf of C&M Pharmacy Inc., d/b/a Parvin’s Pharmacy & Katz Pharmacy, in United States District Court, Central District of California.

Please click C&M Pharmacy, d/b/a Parvin’s Pharmacy & Katz Pharmacy v. GoodRx, Caremark, et al. to view the antitrust class action complaint.

The lawsuits claim that through GoodRx’s “Integrated Savings Program” (“ISP”), these entities conspired to artificially lower generic drug reimbursement rates and impose higher transaction fees, thereby maximizing their profits at the expense of smaller pharmacies.  The ISP allegedly utilizes GoodRx’s pricing algorithm and real-time data from PBMs to determine the prices of generic drug transactions. This system is said to enrich GoodRx and the PBMs while financially harming independent pharmacies.

The lawsuits allege that such practices violate antitrust laws by fixing prices and creating unfair competition, ultimately threatening the viability of independent pharmacies.  As a result, independent pharmacies are reimbursed at the lowest rate as determined by the GoodRx algorithm, which often results in lower payments than the rates originally negotiated with the PBMs.

In a related context, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has been investigating the role of PBMs in the pharmaceutical supply chain. An interim report published in July 2024 highlighted concerns that PBMs, through vertical integration and market concentration, have significant control over prescription drug accessibility and affordability.

The FTC report found that the six largest PBMs manage nearly 95% of all U.S. prescriptions, enabling them to profit at the expense of patients and independent pharmacists. The FTC’s inquiry aims to shed light on PBM practices, including charging fees and clawbacks to unaffiliated pharmacies, steering patients toward PBM-owned pharmacies, and employing opaque reimbursement methods that disadvantage independent pharmacies.

PBMs and Their Alleged Manipulation of Drug Pricing

PBMs allegedly manipulate prescription drug pricing in several ways:

  • Dictating Reimbursement Rates: PBMs force independent pharmacies to accept unreasonably low reimbursement rates for dispensing prescriptions, often lower than the pharmacy’s acquisition costs.
  • Charging Retroactive Fees: PBMs impose Direct and Indirect Remuneration (“DIR”) fees and other retroactive fees on pharmacies, which can significantly reduce the pharmacies’ margins. These fees are often tied to performance metrics and can be substantial.
  • Clawbacks: PBMs sometimes instruct pharmacies to collect higher copays from patients than the actual cost of the drug and then claw back the difference, keeping the excess amount.
  • Specialty Drug Pricing: PBMs mark up the prices of specialty generic drugs by significant amounts and reimburse their affiliated pharmacies at higher rates than unaffiliated pharmacies.
  • Vertical Integration: Many PBMs are part of vertically integrated conglomerates that include their own mail-order, specialty, and retail pharmacies. This integration allows them to steer patients to their own pharmacies and manipulate pricing to benefit their affiliated entities.
  • Opaque Contracts: PBMs offer complex, opaque, and ever-changing contracts to independent pharmacies, often on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, preventing pharmacies from negotiating better terms.
  • Exploiting Market Power: PBMs control access to a large share of the market for prescription drug claims, giving them significant leverage over independent pharmacies. They use this power to dictate terms and underpay those pharmacies.
  • Data Sharing and Algorithmic Pricing: In the case of the GoodRx Integrated Savings Program, PBMs share real-time pricing data with GoodRx, allowing them to algorithmically select the lowest reimbursement rate from competitors, further suppressing payments to pharmacies.

In July 2024, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability released a report scrutinizing the practices of the three largest PBMsCVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx.

The report concluded that these PBMs have monopolized the pharmaceutical marketplace by deploying deliberate, anticompetitive pricing tactics that are raising prescription drug prices, undermining community pharmacies, and harming patients across the United States.

The National Community Pharmacists Association (“NCPA”), representing independent pharmacists, has been vocal about the detrimental effects of PBM practices. In a statement submitted to the House Oversight Committee, the NCPA highlighted how PBMs prioritize their interests, often at the expense of patients, employers, taxpayers, and community pharmacies. The association emphasized the urgent need for Congress to enact robust PBM reform legislation to address these issues.

These developments underscore the growing concern among lawmakers and industry stakeholders regarding PBM practices and their impact on independent pharmacies and patient care.

Questions About the Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Against GoodRx, Caremark, Express Scripts, MedImpact Healthcare and Navitus Health Solutions?

To learn more about the lawsuit or discuss potential legal claims, please send us a message or contact John Kehoe, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation legal evaluation.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a multidisciplinary, plaintiff-side class action law firm specializing in securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duties, and corporate misconduct. Collectively, the firm’s partners have served as Lead Counsel or Co-Lead Counsel in high-profile cases that have recovered more than $10 billion for both institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Computer Employees: Are You Exempt from Minimum Wage and Overtime Pay Requirements?

Computer employees should be aware that the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) requires that most employees in the U.S. be paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime pay at not less than time and one-half the regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 hours in a workweek.

The FLSA, however, provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay for computer systems analysts, computer programmers, software engineers, and other similarly skilled workers in the computer field who meet certain tests regarding their job duties and who are paid at least the standard salary level on a salary basis, or paid on an hourly basis at a rate not less than $27.63 an hour.

It is important to note that job titles do not determine exemption status. For the employer to claim this exemption, an employee’s specific job duties and compensation must meet all the requirements of the Department of Labor’s regulations.

Requirements to Qualify for the Computer Employee Exemption

To qualify for the computer employee exemption, the employer must ensure all the following requirements are met:

  • The employee must be compensated either on a salary or fee basis at a rate not less than the standard salary level required by 29 CFR 541.600 or, if compensated on an hourly basis, at a rate not less than $27.63 an hour;
  • The employee must be employed as a computer systems analyst, computer programmer, software engineer or other similarly skilled worker in the computer field performing the following primary duties:*
      • The application of systems analysis techniques and procedures, including consulting with users, to determine hardware, software or system functional specifications;
      • The design, development, documentation, analysis, creation, testing or modification of computer systems or programs, including prototypes, based on and related to user or system design specifications;
      • The design, documentation, testing, creation or modification of computer programs related to machine operating systems; or
      • A combination of these duties, the performance of which requires the same level of skill.

Computer Employee Exemption: What’s Not Included

The computer employee exemption does not include employees engaged in the manufacture or repair of computer hardware and related equipment.

Employees whose work is highly dependent upon, or facilitated by, the use of computers and computer software programs (e.g., engineers, drafters and others skilled in computer-aided design software), but who are not primarily engaged in computer systems analysis and programming or other similarly skilled computer-related occupations identified in the primary duties test described above, are also not exempt under the computer employee exemption.

*Primary duty means the principal, main, major or most important duty that the employee performs. Determination of an employee’s primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, with the major emphasis on the whole character of the employee’s job.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet 17E.

Have You Been Wrongfully Denied Overtime as a Computer Employee?

    If you believe you have been wrongfully denied overtime by your employer, Kehoe Law Firm is here to help. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to protecting workers’ rights. For a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

    No-Cost Legal Assistance

    Our class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Nurses, Overtime Pay, and the FLSA

    The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires that most employees in the United States be paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime pay at not less than time and one-half the regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek.

    Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, however, provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay for employees employed as bona fide executiveadministrativeprofessional and outside sales employees.

    Section 13(a)(1) and Section 13(a)(17) also exempt certain computer employees.

    To qualify for exemption, employees must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $684 per week.

    Nurses and the Learned Professional Exemption

    To qualify for the learned professional employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:

    • The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $684 per week;
    • The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring advanced knowledge, defined as work which is predominantly intellectual in character and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment;
    • The advanced knowledge must be in a field of science or learning; and
    • The advanced knowledge must be customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.

    Registered nurses who are paid on an hourly basis should receive overtime pay. However, registered nurses who are registered by the appropriate State examining board generally meet the duties requirements for the learned professional exemption and, if paid on a salary basis of at least $684 per week, may be classified as exempt.

    Licensed practical nurses and other similar health care employees, however, generally do not qualify as exempt learned professionals, regardless of work experience and training, because possession of a specialized advanced academic degree is not a standard prerequisite for entry into such occupations, and are entitled to overtime pay.

    Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet 17N.

    Do You Believe Your Employer Has Wrongfully Denied You Overtime Pay?

      If so, Kehoe Law Firm is here to help. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to protecting workers’ rights. For a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

      No-Cost Legal Assistance

      Our class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]

      Memorial Hospital and Manor Data Breach Impacts 120,085

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is making individuals aware that Memorial Hospital and Manor filed a Notice of Data Security Incident with the Office of the Maine Attorney General stating that on November 2, 2024, Memorial Hospital and Manor became aware of unusual activity that disrupted access to certain computer systems.

      Extent of the Memorial Hospital and Manor Data Breach

      The Memorial Hospital and Manor data breach affected 120,085 individuals. Memorial Hospital and Manor’s cyber investigation of the potentially impacted data to identify the individuals and information involved in the breach concluded on January 31, 2025.

      What Information Was Compromised in the Cyberattack

      The hospital’s cybersecurity investigation revealed that certain personal information and personal health information was accessed and acquired without authorization by an unknown actor.

      The type of information obtained during the Memorial Hospital and Manor data breach may have included the following:

      • Names
      • Social Security numbers
      • Dates of birth
      • Health insurance information
      • Medical treatment and/or history information

      Did You Receive a Data Breach Notice from Memorial Hospital and Manor?

      If you received a data breach notice, have questions about the breach, or have experienced fraud, identity theft, or other harm as a result, Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. can help you understand your rights and explore your legal options.

      Free, No-Obligation Case Evaluation

      For a free, no-obligation case evaluation, send us a message below or contact:

      📞 Michael Yarnoff, Esq. – (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
      📧 Email: [email protected] | [email protected]

      No-Cost Legal Assistance

      Our class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning you are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 


       

       

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]

      The FLSA and Overtime Pay – Know Your Rights

      The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments.

      Basic Wage Standards

      Covered, nonexempt workers are entitled to a minimum wage of $7.25 per hour (effective July 24, 2009). Nonexempt workers must be paid overtime pay at a rate of not less than one and one-half times their regular rates of pay after 40 hours of work in a workweek.

      Wages required by the FLSA are due on the regular payday for the pay period covered. Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA.

      The FLSA does, however, contain some exemptions from these basic standards. Some apply to specific types of businesses; others apply to specific kinds of work.

      While the FLSA sets basic minimum wage and overtime pay standards and regulates the employment of minors, there are a number of employment practices which the FLSA does not regulate.

      For example, the FLSA does not require:

      • Vacation, holiday, severance, or sick pay;
      • Meal or rest periods, holidays off, or vacations;
      • Premium pay for weekend or holiday work;
      • Pay raises or fringe benefits; or
      • A discharge notice, reason for discharge, or immediate payment of final wages to terminated employees.

      The FLSA also does not limit the number of hours in a day or days in a week an employee may be required or scheduled to work, including overtime hours, if the employee is at least 16 years old.

      When Is Overtime Pay Required?

      An employer who requires or permits an employee to work overtime is generally required to pay the employee premium pay for such overtime work.

      Basic Overtime Pay Requirments

      Unless specifically exempted, employees covered by the FLSA must receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than time and one-half their regular rates of pay.

      There is no limit in the FLSA on the number of hours employees aged 16 and older may work in any workweek, and the FLSA does not require overtime pay for work on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, or regular days of rest.

      The FLSA applies on a workweek basis. An employee’s workweek is a fixed and regularly recurring period of 168 hours — seven consecutive 24-hour periods. It does not need to coincide with the calendar week, but may begin on any day and at any hour of the day. Different workweeks may be established for different employees or groups of employees.

      Averaging of hours over two or more weeks is not permitted. Generally, overtime pay earned in a particular workweek must be paid on the regular pay day for the pay period in which the wages were earned.

      The regular rate of pay cannot be less than the minimum wage. The regular rate includes all remuneration for employment except certain payments excluded by the FLSA.

      Payments which are not part of the regular rate include pay for expenses incurred on the employer’s behalf, premium payments for overtime work or the true premiums paid for work on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, discretionary bonuses, gifts and payments in the nature of gifts on special occasions, and payments for occasional periods when no work is performed due to vacation, holidays, or illness.

      Earnings may be determined on a piece-rate, salary, commission, or some other basis, but in all such cases the overtime pay due must be computed on the basis of the average hourly rate derived from such earnings. This is calculated by dividing the total pay for employment (except for the statutory exclusions noted above) in any workweek by the total number of hours actually worked.

      Some Common Overtime Problems

      Fixed Sum for Varying Amounts of Overtime: A lump sum paid for work performed during overtime hours without regard to the number of overtime hours worked does not qualify as an overtime premium even though the amount of money paid is equal to or greater than the sum owed on a per-hour basis.

      For example, no part of a flat sum of $180 to employees who work overtime on Sunday will qualify as an overtime premium, even though the employees’ straight-time rate is $12.00 an hour and the employees always work less than 10 hours on Sunday.

      Similarly, where an agreement provides for 6 hours pay at $13.00 an hour regardless of the time actually spent for work on a job performed during overtime hours, the entire $78.00 must be included in determining the employees’ regular rate.

      Salary for Workweek Exceeding 40 Hours: A fixed salary for a regular workweek longer than 40 hours does not discharge FLSA statutory obligations.

      For example, an employee may be hired to work a 45 hour workweek for a weekly salary of $405. In this instance the regular rate is obtained by dividing the $405 straight-time salary by 45 hours, resulting in a regular rate of $9.00. The employee is then due additional overtime computed by multiplying the 5 overtime hours by one-half the regular rate of pay ($4.50 x 5 = $22.50).

      Overtime Pay May Not Be Waived: The overtime requirement may not be waived by agreement between the employer and employees. An agreement that only 8 hours a day or only 40 hours a week will be counted as working time also fails the test of FLSA compliance.

      An announcement by the employer that no overtime work will be permitted, or that overtime work will not be paid for unless authorized in advance, also will not impair the employee’s right to compensation for compensable overtime hours that are worked.

      Improperly Calculating Overtime for Tipped Employees: An employer that takes a tip credit by paying a direct (or cash) wage less than the minimum wage erroneously calculates the overtime premium using only the reduced direct (or cash) wage paid.

      When an employer takes a tip credit, overtime must be calculated based on the full minimum wage, which is currently $7.25 an hour, not the lower direct (or cash) wage payment.  The employer may not take a larger tip credit for an overtime hour than for a straight time hour.  Under certain circumstances, an employer may be able to claim an additional overtime tip credit against its overtime obligations.

      An employer does not include all service charges, commissions, bonuses, and other remuneration in the regular rate for purposes of computing overtime pay.

      Overtime Pay Exemptions

      Some employees are exempt from the overtime pay provisions or both the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions.

      The following are some examples of overtime pay exemptions; they are not all-inclusive, and these examples do not define the conditions for each exemption.

      Exemptions from Both Minimum Wage and Overtime Pay

      Exemptions from Overtime Pay Only

      • Certain commissioned employees of retail or service establishments; auto, truck, trailer, farm implement, boat, or aircraft sales-workers; or parts-clerks and mechanics servicing autos, trucks, or farm implements, who are employed by non-manufacturing establishments primarily engaged in selling these items to ultimate purchasers;
      • Employees of railroads and air carriers, taxi drivers, certain employees of motor carriers, seamen on American vessels, and local delivery employees paid on approved trip rate plans;
      • Announcers, news editors, and chief engineers of certain non-metropolitan broadcasting stations;
      • Domestic service workers living in the employer’s residence; and
      • Employees of motion picture theaters.

      Partial Exemptions from Overtime Pay

      • Partial overtime pay exemptions apply to employees engaged in certain operations on agricultural commodities and to employees of certain bulk petroleum distributors.
      • Hospitals and residential care establishments may adopt, by agreement with their employees, a 14-day work period instead of the usual 7-day workweek if the employees are paid at least time and one-half their regular rates for hours worked over 8 in a day or 80 in a 14-day work period, whichever is the greater number of overtime hours.
      • Employees who lack a high school diploma, or who have not attained the educational level of the 8th grade, can be required to spend up to 10 hours in a workweek engaged in remedial reading or training in other basic skills without receiving time and one-half overtime pay for these hours. However, the employees must receive their normal wages for hours spent in such training and the training must not be job specific.
      • Public agency fire departments and police departments may establish a work period ranging from 7 to 28 days in which overtime need only be paid after a specified number of hours in each work period.

      Computing Overtime Pay

      Overtime must be paid at a rate of at least one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay for each hour worked in a workweek in excess of the maximum allowable in a given type of employment. Generally, the regular rate includes all payments made by the employer to or on behalf of the employee (except for certain statutory exclusions).

      The following examples are based on a maximum 40-hour workweek which applies to most covered nonexempt employees.

      Hourly rate – (regular pay rate for an employee paid by the hour) – If more than 40 hours are worked, at least one and one-half times the regular rate for each hour over 40 is due.

      Example: An employee paid $8.00 an hour works 44 hours in a workweek. The employee is entitled to at least one and one-half times $8.00, or $12.00, for each hour over 40. Pay for the week would be $320 for the first 40 hours, plus $48.00 for the four hours of overtime – a total of $368.00.

      Piece rate – The regular rate of pay for an employee paid on a piecework basis is obtained by dividing the total weekly earnings by the total number of hours worked in that week. The employee is entitled to an additional one-half times this regular rate for each hour over 40, plus the full piecework earnings.

      Example: An employee paid on a piecework basis works 45 hours in a week and earns $405. The regular rate of pay for that week is $405 divided by 45, or $9.00 an hour. In addition to the straight-time pay, the employee is also entitled to $4.50 (half the regular rate) for each hour over 40 – an additional $22.50 for the 5 overtime hours – for a total of $427.50.

      Another way to compensate pieceworkers for overtime, if agreed to before the work is performed, is to pay one and one-half times the piece rate for each piece produced during the overtime hours. The piece rate must be the one actually paid during nonovertime hours and must be enough to yield at least the minimum wage per hour.

      Salary – The regular rate for an employee paid a salary for a regular or specified number of hours a week is obtained by dividing the salary by the number of hours for which the salary is intended to compensate. The employee is entitled to an additional one-half times this regular rate for each hour over 40, plus the salary.

      If, under the employment agreement, a salary sufficient to meet the minimum wage requirement in every workweek is paid as straight time for whatever number of hours are worked in a workweek, the regular rate is obtained by dividing the salary by the number of hours worked each week.

      For example, suppose an employee’s hours of work vary each week and the agreement with the employer is that the employee will be paid $480 a week for whatever number of hours of work are required. Under this agreement, the regular rate will vary in overtime weeks.

      If the employee works 50 hours, the regular rate is $9.60 ($480 divided by 50 hours). In addition to the salary, half the regular rate, or $4.80, is due for each of the 10 overtime hours, for a total of $528 for the week. If the employee works 60 hours, the regular rate is $8.00 ($480 divided by 60 hours). In that case, an additional $4.00 is due for each of the 20 overtime hours for a total of $560 for the week.

      In no case may the regular rate be less than the minimum wage required by the FLSA.

      If a salary is paid on other than a weekly basis, the weekly pay must be determined in order to compute the regular rate and overtime pay. If the salary is for a half month, it must be multiplied by 24 and the product divided by 52 weeks to get the weekly equivalent. A monthly salary should be multiplied by 12 and the product divided by 52.

      Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, HRGFLSA; Fact Sheet 23.

      Did You Work Overtime and Not Get Paid?

      If you worked overtime and your employer failed to pay you for overtime hours, your rights under the FLSA may have been violated.

      Free, No-Obligation Case Evaluation

      Kehoe Law Firm is here to help. Our experienced attorneys are committed to protecting workers’ rights. For a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

      No-Cost Legal Assistance

      Our class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]