Salaried Employees and Overtime Pay

Are salaried employees exempt from overtime pay? //

If you’re a salaried employee, you might assume you don’t qualify for overtime pay—but that’s not always true.

While the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets the baseline for overtime exemption, some states have stricter rules, with higher salary thresholds that impact whether you should be earning overtime pay.

Federal Overtime Exemption Requirements

Under the FLSA, executive, administrative, and professional employees must be paid a minimum salary of $684 per week ($35,568 annually) and meet certain requirements of the FLSA’s job duties test to be exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements.

Under the FLSA, there are minimum wage and overtime exemptions for certain professional employees, as well as for highly-compensated employees earning at least $107,432 per year and individuals in computer-related occupations.

Six States Have Higher Minimum Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemption

If you live in certain states, the salary threshold for overtime exemption is higher than the federal salary threshold of $684/week or $35,568 per year—meaning you could be entitled to overtime pay even if your employer says otherwise.

If you meet certain job duties tests and earn less than the minimum salary threshold amounts in the following states, you may be entitled to overtime for hours worked beyond 40 per week:*

State Weekly Salary ($) Annual Salary ($)
Alaska $952.80 $49,545.60
Alaska (As of July 1, 2025) $1,040.00 $54,080
California $1,320.00 $68,640.00
Colorado $1,086.25 $56,485.00
Maine $845.21 $43,950.92
New York (NYC, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester Counties) $1,237.50 $64,350.00
New York (other areas) $1,161.65 $60,405.80
Washington (> 50 employees) $1,499.40 $77,968.80
Washington (< 50 employees) $1,332.80 $69,306.56

*In certain states, computer professionals have different overtime exemption levels.

What Can Salaried Employees Do if They Have Been Wrongfully Denied Overtime?

If your employer has not paid you overtime and you earn less than the federal or your state’s salary threshold for overtime exemption, you may have a right to unpaid wages. Employers cannot use the federal salary level as an excuse if state law requires a higher threshold.

If you have not received the wages or overtime pay you are entitled to, acting quickly is essential. Federal and state law wage and overtime claims are subject to strict deadlines, known as statutes of limitations. Missing these deadlines could mean losing your right to recover unpaid earnings.

Under the FLSA, for example, most claims for unpaid wages—including minimum wage and overtime violations—must be filed within two years of the violation. If the employer’s violation was willful, the deadline could extend to three years. The longer you wait, the more of your unpaid wages may become unrecoverable. Understanding your rights and legal time limits ensures you do not miss the chance to claim what you are owed.

If you believe you have a claim for unpaid wages, consider seeking legal guidance as soon as possible. To discuss your rights, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Smith & Wesson Privacy Class Action Alleges User Data Shared Despite Cookie Rejection

Smith & Wesson Allegedly Violated its Website User Privacy Policy //

On April 4, 2025, a class action lawsuit was filed against Smith & Wesson Inc. in United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 5:25-cv-03085), alleging an “egregious privacy violation and total breach of consumer trust in violation of California law.”

According to the complaint, Smith & Wesson violated its own written website Privacy Policy, which assured users that they could opt out of accepting cookies by selecting the “Reject All” option on the cookie consent banner. ​ The Privacy Policy stated that users could decline cookies and tracking technologies, and that an “Opt-out Cookie” would be placed on their devices to honor this choice.

Despite these assurances, however, Smith & Wesson allegedly caused third-party cookies and software code to be stored on consumers’ devices and transmitted user data (“private communications”) to third parties, even after users clicked the “Reject All” option in the cookie consent banner.

According to the complaint:

Defendant’s [w]ebsite offers consumers a choice to browse without being tracked, followed, and targeted by third party data brokers and advertisers. However, Defendant’s promises are outright lies, designed to lull users into a false sense of security. Even after users elect to ‘Reject All’ cookies, Defendant surreptitiously enables several third parties – including Google LLC (YouTube, DoubleClick and Google Analytics), X Corp. (formerly Twitter), Listrak, Inc. and Lightbox . . . to place and/or transmit cookies that track users’ website browsing activities and eavesdrop on users’ private communications on the [w]ebsite. (Italics and bold added.)

Summary of Smith & Wesson’s Website Privacy Policy 

Smith & Wesson’s Website Privacy Policy made the following representations to users, according to the complaint:

Option to Opt Out of Cookies: Users were assured that they could opt out of accepting cookies altogether by either selecting the “I do not accept Cookies” option on the cookie consent banner upon their initial visit to the website or setting their browser to not accept cookies or to notify them when a cookie is sent, giving them the chance to decide whether to accept it. ​

Placement of an Opt-Out Cookie: The Privacy Policy stated that if users chose to opt out, an “Opt-out Cookie” would be placed on their computer. ​ This cookie would be browser- and device-specific and would last until cookies were cleared from the browser or device. ​

Respect for User Choices: The Privacy Policy represented to users that their choices to reject cookies would be honored, even if certain Smith & Wesson website functions might not work properly as a result.

According to the complaint:

In truth, [the] Defendant did not abide by its users’ wishes despite its promises that it would honor their request to reject cookies. When users clicked the ‘Reject All’ cookies button, they provided notice to Defendant that they did not consent to the placement or transmission of third-party cookies that would allow those parties to obtain their [p]rivate [c]ommunications with the [w]ebsite. Nevertheless, [the] Defendant caused the [t]hird [p]arty tracking cookies to be placed on [w]ebsite users’ browsers and devices and/or transmitted to the [t]hird [p]arties along with user data—even for those users who elected to reject all cookies. (Italics and bold added.)

The privacy caction against Smith & Wesson, among other things, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as full restitution and disgorgement by Defendant Smith & Wesson of wrongfully obtained revenues and profits.

Smith & Wesson Website Users May Have Legal Claims

Smith & Wesson’s website users who have questions about the class action lawsuit or would like to discuss potential legal claims can send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Canopy Growth Stock Alert – Class Action Filed on Behalf of CGC Investors

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities fraud claims on behalf of investors of Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth” or “Canopy”) (NASDAQ:CGC).

Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filed 

On April 4, 2025, a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed against Canopy Growth in United States District Court, Eastern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-01877), on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Canopy Growth securities between May 30, 2024 and February 6, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The class action lawsuit is pursuing remedies against Canopy and certain of its top officials under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

Class Action Allegations 

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Canopy Growth Defendants allegedly made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that 1) Canopy incurred significant costs producing Claybourne pre-rolled joints in connection with the Claybourne product launch in Canada; 2) these costs, along with indirect costs related to its Storz & Bickel vaporizer devices, were likely to have a significant negative impact on Canopy Growth’s gross margins and overall financial results; and 3) as a result, the Canopy Growth Defendants overstated the effectiveness of Canopy’s cost reduction measures and the health of its gross margins while downplaying related issues.

Canopy Growth Investors May Have Legal Claims 

Investors who acquired Canopy Growth securities during the Class Period are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to contact an attorney to discuss the class action lawsuit and receive a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

Canopy Growth shareholders can also contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq.(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804[email protected][email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

TransMedics Stock Alert- Securities Class Action Filed Against TransMedics Group – TMDX

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities fraud claims on behalf of investors of TransMedics Group, Inc. (“TransMedics”) (NASDAQ:TMDX).

Securities Class Action Lawsuits Filed 

Class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws have been filed against TransMedics in United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:25-cv-10778).

The class action lawsuits were filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired TransMedics securities between February 28, 2023 and January 10, 2025 (the “Class Period”).

To review the allegations contained in one of the complaints, click TransMedics Securities Class Action Complaint.

TransMedics Investors May Have Legal Claims 

Investors who acquired TransMedics securities during the Class Period are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s Stockholder Information Request form or send us a message to contact an attorney to discuss the class action lawsuit and receive a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

TransMedics shareholders can also contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq.(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804[email protected][email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Bakkt Holdings Stock Alert- Securities Class Action Filed Against Bakkt – BKKT

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities fraud claims on behalf of investors of Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (“Bakkt” or “Bakkt Holdings”) (NYSE:BKKT).

Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filed 

On April 2, 2025, a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed against Bakkt Holdings in United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-02753).

The securities class action lawsuit, pursuing claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, was filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Bakkt securities between March 25, 2024 and March 17, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). 

Summary of Class Action Allegations 

According to the class action complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Bakkt Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.

The Bakkt Defendants allegedly misrepresented the stability and/or diversity of its crypto services revenue; failed to disclose Bakkt’s crypto services revenue was substantially dependent on a single contract with Webull; and misrepresented its ability to maintain key client relationships.

Bakkt Investors May Have Legal Claims 

Investors who acquired Bakkt Holdings securities during the Class Period are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s Stockholder Information Request form or send us a message to contact an attorney to discuss the class action lawsuit and receive a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

Bakkt shareholders can also contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq.(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804[email protected][email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]