A securities class action has been filed against Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) and certain of its officers on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Flotek securities between August 3, 2026 and August 17, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby.

Flotek common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FTK.

According to the complaint, Flotek is an energy technology and services company.

What Does the Flotek Securities Class Action Allege?

The action, Bashir v. Flotek Industries, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07285, was filed on August 26, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning Flotek’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose:

• • Concerns about the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) project participants — There were credible reasons to doubt the experience, organization, and financial capacity of the consortium parties for PREPA’s power generation project;
  • Risk to anticipated PREPA revenue — As a result, there was a risk that revenue from the PREPA contract would not be realized; and
  • Allegedly misleading positive statements — As a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about Flotek’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

What Happened to Flotek’s Stock Price?

According to the complaint, on August 17, 2026, Wolfpack Research published a report alleging that Flotek’s $400 million PREPA contract, which the report said accounted for approximately 57% of Flotek’s backlog, had been canceled. The complaint alleges that the report also raised issues concerning the consortium involved in the PREPA project and an allegedly unauthorized signature.

The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price fell $7.17, or 20.01%, to close at $28.66 per share on August 17, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The complaint further alleges that on August 18, 2026, Flotek disclosed that the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico had voted to revoke its approval of the underlying power generation contract and to direct PREPA to terminate the contract. Flotek also disclosed that PREPA had directed consortium parties to hold work on the project while PREPA evaluated the developments. The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price fell another $1.64, or 5.72%, to close at $27.02 per share on August 18, 2026.

According to the complaint, on August 19, 2026, Flotek confirmed that PREPA had delivered formal notice terminating the power purchase and operating agreement, effective immediately. The complaint alleges that Flotek’s stock price then fell $1.85, or 6.85%, to close at $25.17 per share on August 19, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

Review the Flotek Securities Class Action Complaint

Flotek Investors Who Suffered Losses

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Flotek securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses may complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or contact the firm to discuss potential legal claims.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 26, 2026. Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by October 26, 2026. Investors do not need to serve as lead plaintiff to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A verified stockholder derivative complaint filed August 21, 2026 alleges that certain current and former Block, Inc. (“Block” or the “Company”) (NYSE: XYZ) directors and officers failed to adequately oversee compliance risks involving Cash App and harmed the Company.

The action, Iron Workers Local Union No. 401 v. Dorsey, et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-08765, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California derivatively on behalf of Block against certain current and former directors and executive officers. Block is named as the nominal defendant.

What Claims and Relief Are Asserted?

The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste, as well as alleged violations of Sections 14(a), 10(b), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

On behalf of Block, the plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and disgorgement, and corporate-governance and internal-procedure reforms. The requested reforms include measures intended to prevent and remedy practices that violate federal and state consumer-protection and securities laws and additional audit, compliance, and internal-control procedures.

What Does the Complaint Allege?

The complaint alleges that, from at least 2019 through 2024, Block fiduciaries prioritized Cash App growth over compliance and either failed to adequately oversee compliance or caused Block to engage in allegedly unlawful conduct. Specifically, the complaint alleges that:

• Cash App was designed to make signup and use easy, including through minimal identity-verification requirements, and Block fiduciaries allegedly chose to reduce user “friction” rather than implement compliance measures that could slow user acquisition.
• Block became subject to regulatory actions, fines, civil litigation, and other consequences that the complaint attributes to alleged Cash App compliance failures.
• Certain directors and officers allegedly made or allowed false or misleading statements concerning Block’s compliance practices, risk oversight, and Cash App user metrics.
• Certain insiders allegedly sold more than $1.2 billion of Block stock while possessing material nonpublic information concerning the Company’s compliance regime and changing growth metrics.
• The complaint alleges that false or misleading public statements caused Block to repurchase its own stock at inflated prices, further harming the Company.

Regulatory Actions Cited in the Complaint

The complaint cites several 2025 regulatory matters as part of its allegations concerning harm to Block, including:

• A January 2025 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order requiring Block to pay at least $75 million and up to $120 million in consumer redress, plus a $55 million civil penalty, and to implement specified changes to its practices;
• A January 2025 multistate settlement with state money-transmission regulators requiring an $80 million penalty and compliance measures, including an independent review of Block’s anti-money-laundering program; and
• An April 2025 New York State Department of Financial Services consent order imposing a $40 million civil monetary penalty and requiring an independent monitor to assess Block’s remediation and compliance program.

Review a copy of the Block Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint.

What Is a Stockholder Derivative Action — and Why Does It Matter?

A stockholder derivative action is brought by a stockholder on behalf of the corporation to pursue claims that allegedly belong to the company. Unlike a securities class action seeking direct damages for investors, a derivative action can seek relief for the corporation itself, which can be significant to stockholders. In this case, the complaint seeks monetary recovery for Block as well as reforms to the Company’s governance, compliance, audit, and internal-control procedures designed to protect Block and its stockholders from a recurrence of the alleged misconduct.

Why Should Stockholders Come Forward?

Stockholders can play an important role in derivative litigation by seeking accountability for alleged misconduct and pursuing relief intended to benefit the company. A stockholder serving as a derivative plaintiff acts on behalf of the corporation rather than simply seeking an individual damages payment.

Here, the complaint asks the court to award damages to Block, require restitution and disgorgement from the individual defendants, and direct Block to improve its corporate governance and internal procedures, including additional audit, compliance, and internal-control measures. These forms of relief are intended to benefit the Company and its stockholders by seeking to restore corporate value and strengthen protections against future misconduct.

Block Stockholders: Questions About the Derivative Action?

If you are a current Block stockholder and have questions about the derivative action, your rights as a stockholder, or the role a stockholder may play in derivative litigation, Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is available to discuss the case and evaluate your circumstances.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, send us a message or contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A securities class action has been filed against Taboola.com Ltd. (“Taboola” or the “Company”) and certain of its officers on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Taboola securities between May 6, 2026 and August 4, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby.

Taboola ordinary shares trade on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol TBLA.

According to the complaint, Taboola operates a platform that partners with websites, devices, and mobile apps to recommend editorial content and advertisements on the open web.

What Does the Taboola Securities Class Action Allege?

The action, Fortin v. Taboola.com Ltd., et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07170, was filed on August 21, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning Taboola’s business, operations, and prospects. The complaint alleges that:

• Taboola was seeing an increase in low-quality publishers;
• As a result, the Company would need to take an aggressive approach to exiting low-quality publisher relationships, impacting earnings;
• As a result, the value of the Company’s publisher relationships was overstated; and
• Defendants’ positive statements about Taboola’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

The complaint further alleges that, on May 6, 2026, Taboola announced first-quarter 2026 financial results and supported its second-quarter and full-year 2026 guidance while emphasizing advertiser success, data, AI, and distribution.

What Happened to Taboola’s Stock Price?

According to the complaint, before the market opened on August 5, 2026, Taboola reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $476.8 million, below its previously issued second-quarter revenue guidance of $492 million to $505 million. The complaint also alleges that Taboola reduced its full-year 2026 revenue guidance by $91 million at the midpoint, to $1.930 billion to $1.956 billion, and reduced expected full-year gross profit by $10 million at the midpoint, to $605 million to $615 million.

The complaint alleges that, during Taboola’s August 5, 2026 earnings call, CFO Stephen Walker stated that revenue was below guidance, in part, because the Company took a more aggressive approach to exiting publisher relationships that did not meet its standards for advertiser success. CEO Adam Singolda also discussed the Company’s decision to remove low-quality publishers that were not delivering value for advertisers.

Following these disclosures, the complaint alleges that Taboola’s share price fell $1.45, or 27.41%, to close at $3.84 per share on August 5, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

Review the Taboola-Securities-Class-Action-Complaint

Taboola Investors Who Suffered Losses

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Taboola securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses may complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq. for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 20, 2026. Investors have until October 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. Investors do not need to serve as lead plaintiff to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

A securities class action has been filed against GoDaddy Inc. (“GoDaddy” or the “Company”) and certain of its officers on behalf of all purchasers of GoDaddy common stock during the period from September 3, 2025 through February 24, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”) who were damaged thereby. 

GoDaddy common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol GDDY.

According to the complaint, GoDaddy is an American publicly traded internet domain registry, domain registrar, and web hosting company headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The complaint alleges that GoDaddy primarily serves small and micro companies and targets small business owners and entrepreneurs, including customers seeking an all-in-one platform to build and manage an online presence.

What Does the GoDaddy Securities Class Action Allege?

The action, Johnson v. GoDaddy Inc., et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07144, was filed on August 21, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or omitted material information concerning GoDaddy’s customer-acquisition and go-to-market strategy. The complaint alleges that:

• GoDaddy introduced a heavily discounted promotional price of $4.99 for one-year dotcom domain contracts, significantly below the Company’s typical multi-year contracts, which ranged from $10 to $20 per year;
• The promotion allegedly contradicted Defendants’ representations that GoDaddy was focused on attracting “high-intent” customers who purchased more products and spent more money, including representations that the Company had “turned off” discounting at the front of its customer funnel;
• The shorter-term promotional contracts with smaller valuations were likely to, and allegedly did, negatively affect total bookings growth and average order size; and
• Defendants allegedly failed to disclose the promotion and its adverse effect on bookings while continuing to represent that GoDaddy’s high-intent customer strategy was working and that total bookings growth for 2025 was expected to be in line with revenue growth.

The complaint further alleges that, during investor presentations and earnings calls between September and December 2025, GoDaddy executives repeatedly emphasized the Company’s strategy of targeting higher-intent customers. Among other things, the complaint alleges that CFO Mark McCaffrey stated on September 3, 2025 that GoDaddy had made a “conscious decision” to “turn off discounting” because discounting attracted customers who came in for price and later churned. The complaint alleges that GoDaddy nevertheless instituted promotional discounts during the Class Period.

What Happened to GoDaddy’s Stock Price?

The complaint alleges that the truth was revealed after the market closed on February 24, 2026, when GoDaddy reported its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results. According to the complaint, total bookings growth decelerated to 5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, down from 9% in the prior quarter and below analyst estimates of 7%. Full-year 2025 total bookings growth came in at 7%, below Defendants’ previously stated expectation of 8%.

According to the complaint, during the associated earnings call, CEO Aman Bhutani disclosed that GoDaddy had introduced a promotional price for dotcom domains with a one-year term and that stronger-than-expected demand for the offer, together with the shift in contract-term mix, reduced upfront bookings and near-term revenue. The complaint further alleges that CFO Mark McCaffrey acknowledged that the annual promotional contracts affected bookings and reduced average order size at initiation.

Following these disclosures, GoDaddy’s stock price declined $13.18 per share, or more than 14%, from a closing price of $92.30 per share on February 24, 2026 to $79.12 per share on February 25, 2026, on heavier than usual volume.

Review the GoDaddy securities class action complaint.

GoDaddy Investors Who Suffered Losses

Investors who purchased GoDaddy common stock during the Class Period and suffered financial losses may complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq. for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

GDDY investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff have until October 20, 2026 to move the Court. An investor’s ability to share in any potential recovery does not depend on serving as lead plaintiff.

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]