Deep Fission Securities Investigation | FISN

Did You Lose Money Investing in Deep Fission (FISN)?

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of investors who purchased Deep Fission, Inc. (“Deep Fission” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FISN) shares in or traceable to the Company’s June 2026 initial public offering (“IPO”) and/or Deep Fission shares in the open market following the IPO.

In its IPO, Deep Fission sold 2.5 million shares at $16 per share in the offering, raising $40 million in gross proceeds. Before the offering, the Company promoted a target levelized cost of electricity of $50–$70 per megawatt-hour. Its June 2026 prospectus later disclosed reactor-level estimates that included approximately $152 million in capital costs for an initial commercial reactor and approximately $84 million per reactor for a planned larger configuration. The Company described those figures as reflecting certain estimates and assumptions then being used internally by management.

After the offering, Deep Fission continued to make public statements about the expected cost and speed of deploying its reactors. In September 2026, the Company described drilling at the required diameter and depth as routine commercial work and said its underground design was expected to reduce construction costs and shorten schedules. It also stated that it was targeting commercial deployment as early as 2027.

On September 24, 2026, Iceberg Research published a short-seller report challenging Deep Fission’s projected reactor economics and commercialization plans.

Following publication of the short-seller report, Deep Fission’s stock price fell approximately 11%, declining from a prior-day close of $7.80 to close at $6.95 per share.

Deep Fission Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you purchased Deep Fission (FISN) shares in or traceable to the June 2026 IPO and/or in the open market after the IPO, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the investigation and your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Tigo Energy Securities Class Action | TYGO Investors

Did You Suffer Financial Losses Investing in Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO)?

A securities class action has been filed on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo Energy, Inc. (“Tigo” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: TYGO) securities between February 24, 2026 and August 4, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The action, Shim v. Tigo Energy, et al., Case No. 5:26-cv-10888, was filed on September 24, 2026 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint asserts claims under the federal securities laws.

What Does the Tigo Energy Class Action Allege?

According to the complaint, Tigo “materially misled investors as to the status of a key commercial partnership, claiming that it was on pace to earn significant income from sales made through the partnership in 2026, while in reality, the execution of the partnership had been delayed.”

The complaint alleges that on August 4, 2026, Tigo revised its full-year 2026 guidance downward from $130–$135 million to $100–$110 million. Tigo stated that the revision reflected its U.S. optimized inverter partner’s “shift of its go-to-market launch to the fourth quarter.”

On this news, the complaint alleges, Tigo’s stock price fell from $2.04 on August 4 to $1.29 per share on August 5, “a drop of approximately 37%, on unusually heavy trading volume.”

November 23, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo securities during the Class Period have until November 23, 2026 to move the Court to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain a member of the proposed class.

Tigo Energy Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo Energy securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the class action and your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Zillow Fiduciary Duty Investigation | Z, ZG

    Do You Own Zillow Common Stock?

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Zillow Group, Inc. (“Zillow” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: Z, ZG) may have breached their fiduciary duties to Zillow in connection with Zillow’s February 2025 agreements with Redfin Corporation and whether Zillow and its shareholders suffered harm as a result.

    What Is the Zillow Investigation About?

    On September 30, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed a complaint against Zillow and Redfin in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, captioned Federal Trade Commission v. Zillow Group, Inc., Zillow, Inc., and Redfin Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-01638.

    The complaint alleges that, on February 6, 2025, Zillow and Redfin entered into two agreements: the Partnership Agreement and the Content License Agreement. According to the complaint, under the Partnership Agreement, Zillow paid Redfin $100 million “to stop competing, facilitate the transition of the bulk of its multifamily rental advertising business to Zillow, and shut down the remainder.”

    The complaint further alleges that under the Content License Agreement, Redfin agreed “to stay out of the market for up to 9 years and to use its network to show only rental listings that are also displayed on Zillow’s sites.” The FTC alleges that the agreement “will result in reduced choice, higher prices, and reduced quality for multifamily rental advertising customers.”

    The FTC alleges that the Zillow-Redfin agreement violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and thus constitutes an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The FTC also alleges that Zillow’s acquisition of certain Redfin assets violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act because it may substantially lessen competition in the relevant markets for internet listing services (“ILS”) advertising, and that the agreements constitute an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.

    On August 24, 2026, the FTC announced that it and five states notified the court that they would file a stipulated order to resolve the litigation. According to the FTC, the proposed order requires Zillow and Redfin to amend their agreement, removes restrictions on Redfin’s ability to compete independently in the ILS advertising market, and requires Redfin to restart its ILS rental advertising business within six months after the order is finalized.

    Why Does This Matter to Zillow Shareholders?

    Kehoe Law Firm is investigating whether certain Zillow officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the agreements with Redfin and whether Zillow suffered harm as a result.

    Zillow Shareholders: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

    If you own Zillow common stock, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the investigation and your potential legal rights.

    For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

    Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
    (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Hims & Hers Fiduciary Duty Investigation | HIMS

    Do You Own Hims & Hers Common Stock?

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (“Hims & Hers” or the “Company”) (NYSE: HIMS) may have breached their fiduciary duties to Hims & Hers, and whether the Company and its shareholders suffered harm as a result.

    What Is the Hims & Hers Investigation About?

    On July 29, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission, the Utah Division of Consumer Protection, and the People of the State of California, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, captioned Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-07871.

    The complaint alleges that Hims & Hers represented that it “would not disclose consumers’ health information to third parties” and advertised a “100% online, private, and secure process.” According to the complaint, “[d]espite promising privacy and discretion, Hims & Hers shared consumers’ sensitive health information with third-party advertising companies and platforms,” including Meta and Snap. The complaint further alleges that Hims “did not clearly and conspicuously disclose to consumers that it would share their health information with Advertising Platforms.” It describes the Company as sharing consumers’ health information “by Sharing Its Customer Lists and Using Pixel Tracking.”

    The complaint also alleges that Hims & Hers failed to “timely disclose material terms of the transaction, clearly and conspicuously, before obtaining the consumer’s billing information.” It further alleges that the Company “failed to obtain the consumer’s express informed consent” before charging the consumer and “failed to provide simple mechanisms for a consumer to stop recurring charges.”

    Hims & Hers Shareholders: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

    If you own Hims & Hers common stock, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the investigation and your potential legal rights.

    For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

    Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
    (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Honeywell Aerospace Securities Class Action | HONA Investors

    Did You Suffer Financial Losses Investing in Honeywell Aerospace Inc. (HONA)?

    A securities class action has been filed on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Honeywell Aerospace Inc. (“Honeywell Aerospace” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: HONA) common stock between June 29, 2026 and September 1, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

    The action, Green v. Honeywell Aerospace Inc., et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-06779-SHD, was filed on September 22, 2026 in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

    What Does the Honeywell Aerospace Class Action Allege?

    According to the complaint, during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning Honeywell Aerospace’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose that a small percentage of the Company’s suppliers had a disproportionate impact on sales; those suppliers were experiencing supply constraints; those constraints were reasonably likely to have a material unfavorable impact on sales and profitability; and the Company was under investigation for potential False Claims Act violations for failing to comply with cybersecurity requirements for government contracts.

    According to the complaint, on August 5, 2026, after the market closed, Honeywell Aerospace announced second-quarter 2026 earnings, reporting that net income fell 70% year-over-year and adjusted earnings per share declined 32% year-over-year. The Company also reduced its full-year 2026 guidance, including expected year-over-year adjusted EBIT growth from 7%-10% to flat-to-3%. On this news, Honeywell Aerospace’s share price fell $47.17, or 23.16%, to close at $156.47 on August 6, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

    The complaint further alleges that on September 1, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Honeywell Aerospace agreed to pay $2,042,518 to resolve False Claims Act allegations concerning compliance with cybersecurity requirements in a U.S. Department of Defense contract. According to the complaint, Honeywell Aerospace’s stock price fell $3.87, or 2.45%, to close at $154.24 on September 1, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

    November 23, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

    Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Honeywell Aerospace common stock during the Class Period have until November 23, 2026 to move the Court to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain a member of the proposed class.

    Honeywell Aerospace Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

    If you purchased or otherwise acquired Honeywell Aerospace common stock during the Class Period and suffered financial losses, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the class action and your potential legal rights.

    For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

    Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
    (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

      About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

      Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]

      Tobacco Health Insurance Surcharge

      Paying More for Employer Health Insurance Because of Tobacco or Nicotine Use?

      Employer-sponsored health plans may charge employees more for health coverage because they or a covered family member use tobacco or nicotine products. Depending on how a wellness program is structured, disclosed, and administered, these surcharges may raise issues under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and related wellness-program requirements.

      Recent Proposed Settlements Illustrate Tobacco-Surcharge Litigation

      Two class action matters in which motions for preliminary approval of proposed settlements were filed on September 21, 2026 illustrate the types of ERISA claims being litigated over employer tobacco and nicotine surcharges.

      LHC Group. Knight v. LHC Group, Inc., No. 6:25-cv-00263 (W.D. La.). The plaintiff alleges that LHC Group, Inc. violated ERISA by imposing a discriminatory tobacco surcharge on Plan participants without offering a reasonable alternative standard as required by ERISA and its implementing regulations. The Court denied LHC Group’s motions to dismiss. The parties thereafter reached an agreement in principle to resolve the case on a class-wide basis after exchanging information and engaging in arm’s-length negotiations. The September 21, 2026 filing seeks preliminary approval of a proposed common-fund class action settlement that, if approved, would establish a Gross Settlement Amount of $800,000.

      Nordstrom. Takala v. Nordstrom, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-01396-JHC (W.D. Wash.). The plaintiffs allege that Nordstrom, Inc. violated ERISA by imposing a $20 biweekly tobacco surcharge on Plan participants without satisfying ERISA’s wellness-program requirements, including the required disclosures concerning a reasonable alternative standard, and breached fiduciary duties by administering surcharge revenue for its own benefit. Nordstrom denies all liability. The September 21, 2026 unopposed motion seeks preliminary approval of a class action settlement that would create a $450,000 common fund funded by Nordstrom. The proposed settlement remains subject to court approval.

      What Employees Should Know About Tobacco and Nicotine Surcharges

      These examples do not establish that every tobacco or nicotine surcharge violates ERISA. Whether a particular surcharge may warrant legal review depends on the plan documents and disclosures, whether ERISA’s wellness-program requirements were satisfied, including requirements concerning a reasonable alternative standard, and how the program was administered.

      Employees: Questions About a Tobacco or Nicotine Surcharge?

      If you paid a tobacco or nicotine surcharge through an employer-sponsored health plan—includinga surcharge based on a covered family member’s tobacco or nicotine use – you may contact Kehoe Law Firm to discuss your circumstances and potential legal rights.

      For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

      Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
      (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
      [email protected]
      [email protected]

      About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally-recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors and consumers in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

      Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval. 

       

       

       

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]