Are you a victim of illegal robocalls, text messages or “junk” faxes?

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. Is Making Consumers Aware of Recent Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Lighthouse Insurance Group, LLC

Class action filed in United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, against Lighthouse Insurance Group, LLC.  According to the complaint, Lighthouse Insurance Group “repeatedly makes unsolicited autodialed phone calls to consumers’ telephones including cellular telephones all without any prior express consent to make such calls.” The Plaintiffs, allegedly, received unsolicited calls from (252) 388-8025, (252) 562-9338, and (513) 348-1282.

Albertsons Companies, Inc., d/b/a Vons Pharmacy

Class action filed in United States District Court, Southern District of California, against Albertsons Companies, Inc., d/b/a Vons Pharmacy and other defendants, as of yet unknown. The Plaintiff, allegedly, was contacted on her cell phone without her “prior express consent” by Albertsons Companies, d/b/a Vons Pharmacy, “in an effort to sell or solicit [Defendant’s] services.”

Good Chemistry I, LLC

Class action filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Good Chemistry I, LLC.  According to the complaint, Good Chemistry I sent unsolicited telemarketing text messages to the cellular telephones of consumers.  The Plaintiff, allegedly, “participates in Good Chemistry’s Loyalty Program. However, Plaintiff has never provided his prior express consent to Good Chemistry to receive text messages soliciting him to purchase its products and services.”  The Plaintiff, according to the complaint, received the following text messages from Good Chemistry I:

On or around March 16, 2020, at 4:27 p.m., Plaintiff received an unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Take advantage of online ordering at Good Chemistry for express, in-store pickup. Click the link below to start your order. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://ash3.co/gC4XbnZZkc08”.

On March 18, 2020, at 11:09 a.m., Plaintiff received another unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Personal reservations and online ordering are now available at Good Chemistry for express shopping at all locations. Click the link below to learn more. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://y6jk.co/gC6jkeMrth62”.

Later, on March 18, 2020, at 5:33 p.m., Plaintiff received yet another unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Starting 3/19 updated Good Chemistry hours + other steps we are taking to provide you the fastest, easiest and healthiest access. Click the link below to learn more. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://y6jk.co/gC6yjoKWWnS9”.

A1 Diabetes & Medical Supply, Inc.

Class action filed in United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee against A1 Diabetes & Medical Supply, Inc.  According to the complaint, the Plaintiff’s cell phone received autodialed calls, voicemails, and text messages from telephone numbers (620) 951-5146, (901) 472-2903, (888) 996-0469, (501) 764-3117, (855) 953-0080, (855) 950-0809, (855) 943-0589, and (855) 964-0793.  The Plaintiff, allegedly, never gave his cell phone number to the Defendant, was contacted despite Plaintiff’s request for calls to stop, and did not give consent for A1 Diabetes to call him.

Credit One Bank, N.A.

Class action filed in United States District Court, District of Nevada, against Credit One Bank, N.A. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff “[a]s early as February 10, 2020 . . . began receiving pre-recorded, artificial voice phone calls from [Capital One Bank] on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, soliciting Plaintiff to open a new credit card with [Capital One Bank].” The calls to Plaintiff continued, despite Plaintiff’s alleged attempts to opt out of receiving unsolicited calls from Capital One Bank.

Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.

Class action filed in United States District Court, District of New Jersey, against Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.  According to the complaint, the Plaintiff never provided prior express consent to contact her cell phone or her cellular telephone number to Palmer Administrative Services or any of its agents or contractors. The calls Plaintiff received were, allegedly, made in an effort “to solicit Plaintiff and other members of the alleged Class to purchase the auto warranty agreements that Palmer sells, administers, and is a party to.”

Creditors Relief, LLC

Class action filed in United States District Court, District of New Jersey, against Creditors Relief, LLC. According to the complaint, “[i]n or around March 2017, Plaintiff . . . began receiving prerecorded telemarketing calls from Defendant Creditors Relief.”  The Plaintiff received calls from telephone number (302) 219-9678, “all placed for the purpose of soliciting [Plaintiff] to purchase Creditors Relief’s debt restructuring services.”  Another Plaintiff, allegedly, received calls from Creditors Relief from telephone numbers (737) 702-9272, (424) 213-6470, (747) 223-8773, (760) 304-1136, and (626) 538-2569.  According to the complaint, “[a]ll of the calls solicited Plaintiff . . . to purchase Creditors Relief’s debt resolution services.”

Party City Holdings, Inc.

Class action lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Party City Holdings, Inc.  According to the complaint, the Plaintiff’s cell phone received automated unsolicited marketing text messages from 94467 without Plaintiff’s prior express written consent.

Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC

Class action filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC. According to the complaint, one of the

[Plaintiffs] received a text message from Defendants on December 7, 2019, from the number identified on his caller ID as 657-360-4652. The unsolicited robotext stated: “Congrats Brian! Your code 7SR-K9M2 printed on your last receipt is among 7 we randomly picked for $1,000 Walmart gift card promotion c6rzc.info/lg6RF72BTV87.”

[Plaintiff] replied ‘Stop.’

Defendants sent the unsolicited robotext to [Plaintiff’s] cellular telephone for the purpose of sending [Plaintiff] spam advertisements and promotional offers, via text messages, like those described above.

According to the complaint,

[o]n December 24, 2019, at 9:09 a.m., [another Plaintiff] received an unsolicited robotext message from Defendants from the number identified on her caller ID as 951-391-2478. This unsolicited message stated: “Congrats WAYNE L! Your code R5Z-M9T8 printed on your last receipt is among 7 we randomly picked for $1,000 Walmart gift card promotion n1xrn.info/A9lcOJ4mtGyC.”

Since December 24, 2019 until the present, Defendants have continued to send [Plaintiff] spam advertisements and promotional offers, via unsolicited text messages.

[Plaintiff] received an unsolicited robotext from Defendants purporting to be from Amazon, stating: “FINAL NOTICE: WAYNE L, please review your address details for shipment ID: 7S86J3 HERE: l8cr.xyz/M5GpXbsJCe Sender: AMAZON.”

. . . [Plaintiff] never consented to receive phone calls or text messages from Defendants.

Elavon, Inc. and 7231911 Canada Inc., d/b/a Digitech Payments

Class action filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, against Elavon, Inc. and 7231911 Canada Inc., d/b/a Digitech Payments.  According to the complaint, “[t]he Plaintiff received an automated telemarketing call from Digitech Payments on behalf of Elavon on February 12, 2020” from (778) 819-0300.

Do You Believe You Are a Victim of Illegal Robocalls, Text Messages, “Junk” Faxes or Telemarketing Sales Calls?

If you have received illegal robocalls, text messages, “junk” faxes or telemarketing sales calls, you may be able to recover at least $500 for each illegal call, text or fax you received and, possibly, as much as $1,500 for each illegal call, text message or facsimile that was made either willfully or knowingly in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

To help evaluate your potential legal claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, please complete KLF’s confidential Robocall Questionnaire or, if you prefer to speak with an attorney, please complete the form above on the right, e-mail [email protected] or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your potential legal rights.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.