Rest Breaks & Unpaid Wages | Employee Rights

Were You Denied Required Rest Breaks or Pay for Break Time?

Employees may have claims for unpaid wages when they are denied rest breaks required by state law or are not paid for break time that legally counts as time worked. Rest-break requirements vary by state, while federal law provides separate rules governing when break time must be treated as paid working time.

Federal Law: Does the FLSA Require Rest Breaks?

Generally, no. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not generally require an employer to give adult employees rest or meal breaks. State law, however, may require breaks.

Under the FLSA, short rest periods—usually 20 minutes or less—generally must be counted as hours worked and paid. By contrast, bona fide meal periods, typically 30 minutes or more, generally do not have to be paid if the employee is completely relieved from duty. For more information, see the U.S. Department of Labor Fact Sheet #22: Hours Worked Under the FLSA and the U.S. Department of Labor’s state rest-period requirements table.

Colorado Example: Alleged Missed Rest Breaks and Unpaid Wages

A recently filed class action illustrates how missed rest breaks may result in claims for unpaid wages. The complaint cites the Colorado Overtime and Minimum Pay Standards Order (the “COMPS Order”), 7 Colo. Code Regs. § 1103-1-5.2, and states that it requires employees to be authorized and permitted ten-minute rest breaks in the middle of each four-hour work period or “major fraction thereof.”

The class action, Valdez v. Benihana Broomfield Corp, filed September 24, 2026 in Denver County District Court, alleges that Benihana Broomfield Corp. (“Benihana”) failed to authorize and permit required rest breaks and failed to compensate employees for missed rest breaks.

The complaint alleges that “Defendant failed to authorize and permit required ten-minute rest breaks for every four hours worked or major fraction thereof to Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees.” According to the complaint, time pressures and alleged systematic understaffing resulted in employees being regularly interrupted and required to perform work without ten-minute rest breaks.

The complaint further alleges that each missed ten-minute rest break effectively resulted in ten minutes of unpaid working time and that, for each missed break, Benihana owes additional straight-time, minimum-wage and/or overtime pay for that unpaid working time. The lawsuit seeks damages and backpay on behalf of individuals who worked as hourly paid employees for Benihana in Colorado within the statute of limitations.

Why the Federal and Colorado Rules Are Different

The Benihana complaint is based on Colorado law. Under the COMPS Order, employers generally must authorize and permit compensated ten-minute rest periods for each four hours of work, or major fractions thereof.

The FLSA does not itself create that general rest-break requirement. Instead, federal law generally requires that short breaks an employer provides be treated as paid working time. An employee’s rights therefore may depend on both state-law break requirements and federal or state rules governing whether break time must be paid.

Workers: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you believe you were denied legally required rest breaks, worked through breaks, or were not paid for all compensable time, you are encouraged to send us a message to learn more about your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan matters. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

 

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Deep Fission Securities Investigation | FISN

Did You Lose Money Investing in Deep Fission (FISN)?

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of investors who purchased Deep Fission, Inc. (“Deep Fission” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FISN) shares in or traceable to the Company’s June 2026 initial public offering (“IPO”) and/or Deep Fission shares in the open market following the IPO.

In its IPO, Deep Fission sold 2.5 million shares at $16 per share in the offering, raising $40 million in gross proceeds. Before the offering, the Company promoted a target levelized cost of electricity of $50–$70 per megawatt-hour. Its June 2026 prospectus later disclosed reactor-level estimates that included approximately $152 million in capital costs for an initial commercial reactor and approximately $84 million per reactor for a planned larger configuration. The Company described those figures as reflecting certain estimates and assumptions then being used internally by management.

After the offering, Deep Fission continued to make public statements about the expected cost and speed of deploying its reactors. In September 2026, the Company described drilling at the required diameter and depth as routine commercial work and said its underground design was expected to reduce construction costs and shorten schedules. It also stated that it was targeting commercial deployment as early as 2027.

On September 24, 2026, Iceberg Research published a short-seller report challenging Deep Fission’s projected reactor economics and commercialization plans.

Following publication of the short-seller report, Deep Fission’s stock price fell approximately 11%, declining from a prior-day close of $7.80 to close at $6.95 per share.

Deep Fission Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you purchased Deep Fission (FISN) shares in or traceable to the June 2026 IPO and/or in the open market after the IPO, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the investigation and your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

CFTC Alleges $950 Million Cash FX Group Fraud Scheme

On September 25, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC) announced that it filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Cash FX Group S.A. and its CEO, Huascar Jose Lopez Castillo, of Brazil; The Conversion Pros, Inc. and its CEO, Ronald Pope, of Oregon; and Justin Halladay, of Florida.

The complaint alleges the defendants operated a multilevel marketing Ponzi scheme, fraudulently soliciting and accepting over $950 million from the public, including individuals in the United States, for the purported purpose of trading retail foreign currency contracts in a commodity pool.

According to the complaint, the defendants falsely claimed pool funds were traded by expert traders, proprietary algorithms, and artificial intelligence, and promised up to 15% weekly returns on that trading.

Contrary to their representations, according to the CFTC, Cash FX engaged in minimal forex trading. Instead, it misappropriated nearly all participant funds, using new contributions from participants to pay fictitious trading profits to other participants and paying millions of dollars to each defendant. The CFTC reported that Cash FX also provided false account statements to participants to perpetuate the lie that it was generating large trading returns, and Cash FX’s participants lost at least $406 million. 

What Does the CFTC Seek?

The CFTC seeks restitution, disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations. 

Source: CFTC Release No. 9304-26. 

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally-recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

All representation is provided on a contingency-fee basis, and plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees, court costs, or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval. 

 

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Tigo Energy Securities Class Action | TYGO Investors

Did You Suffer Financial Losses Investing in Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO)?

A securities class action has been filed on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo Energy, Inc. (“Tigo” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: TYGO) securities between February 24, 2026 and August 4, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The action, Shim v. Tigo Energy, et al., Case No. 5:26-cv-10888, was filed on September 24, 2026 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint asserts claims under the federal securities laws.

What Does the Tigo Energy Class Action Allege?

According to the complaint, Tigo “materially misled investors as to the status of a key commercial partnership, claiming that it was on pace to earn significant income from sales made through the partnership in 2026, while in reality, the execution of the partnership had been delayed.”

The complaint alleges that on August 4, 2026, Tigo revised its full-year 2026 guidance downward from $130–$135 million to $100–$110 million. Tigo stated that the revision reflected its U.S. optimized inverter partner’s “shift of its go-to-market launch to the fourth quarter.”

On this news, the complaint alleges, Tigo’s stock price fell from $2.04 on August 4 to $1.29 per share on August 5, “a drop of approximately 37%, on unusually heavy trading volume.”

November 23, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo securities during the Class Period have until November 23, 2026 to move the Court to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain a member of the proposed class.

Tigo Energy Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Tigo Energy securities during the Class Period and suffered financial losses, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the class action and your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Zillow Fiduciary Duty Investigation | Z, ZG

    Do You Own Zillow Common Stock?

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Zillow Group, Inc. (“Zillow” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: Z, ZG) may have breached their fiduciary duties to Zillow in connection with Zillow’s February 2025 agreements with Redfin Corporation and whether Zillow and its shareholders suffered harm as a result.

    What Is the Zillow Investigation About?

    On September 30, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed a complaint against Zillow and Redfin in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, captioned Federal Trade Commission v. Zillow Group, Inc., Zillow, Inc., and Redfin Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-01638.

    The complaint alleges that, on February 6, 2025, Zillow and Redfin entered into two agreements: the Partnership Agreement and the Content License Agreement. According to the complaint, under the Partnership Agreement, Zillow paid Redfin $100 million “to stop competing, facilitate the transition of the bulk of its multifamily rental advertising business to Zillow, and shut down the remainder.”

    The complaint further alleges that under the Content License Agreement, Redfin agreed “to stay out of the market for up to 9 years and to use its network to show only rental listings that are also displayed on Zillow’s sites.” The FTC alleges that the agreement “will result in reduced choice, higher prices, and reduced quality for multifamily rental advertising customers.”

    The FTC alleges that the Zillow-Redfin agreement violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and thus constitutes an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The FTC also alleges that Zillow’s acquisition of certain Redfin assets violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act because it may substantially lessen competition in the relevant markets for internet listing services (“ILS”) advertising, and that the agreements constitute an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.

    On August 24, 2026, the FTC announced that it and five states notified the court that they would file a stipulated order to resolve the litigation. According to the FTC, the proposed order requires Zillow and Redfin to amend their agreement, removes restrictions on Redfin’s ability to compete independently in the ILS advertising market, and requires Redfin to restart its ILS rental advertising business within six months after the order is finalized.

    Why Does This Matter to Zillow Shareholders?

    Kehoe Law Firm is investigating whether certain Zillow officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the agreements with Redfin and whether Zillow suffered harm as a result.

    Zillow Shareholders: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

    If you own Zillow common stock, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form or send us a message to learn more about the investigation and your potential legal rights.

    For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

    Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
    (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    There is no cost or obligation to speak with the firm, and there are no upfront fees or litigation costs. We handle class action matters on a contingency-fee basis. Any attorneys’ fees or expenses sought in connection with a recovery are subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]