Salaried Employees and Overtime Pay

Are salaried employees exempt from overtime pay? //

If you’re a salaried employee, you might assume you don’t qualify for overtime pay—but that’s not always true.

While the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets the baseline for overtime exemption, some states have stricter rules, with higher salary thresholds that impact whether you should be earning overtime pay.

Federal Overtime Exemption Requirements

Under the FLSA, executive, administrative, and professional employees must be paid a minimum salary of $684 per week ($35,568 annually) and meet certain requirements of the FLSA’s job duties test to be exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements.

Under the FLSA, there are minimum wage and overtime exemptions for certain professional employees, as well as for highly-compensated employees earning at least $107,432 per year and individuals in computer-related occupations.

Six States Have Higher Minimum Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemption

If you live in certain states, the salary threshold for overtime exemption is higher than the federal salary threshold of $684/week or $35,568 per year—meaning you could be entitled to overtime pay even if your employer says otherwise.

If you meet certain job duties tests and earn less than the minimum salary threshold amounts in the following states, you may be entitled to overtime for hours worked beyond 40 per week:*

State Weekly Salary ($) Annual Salary ($)
Alaska $952.80 $49,545.60
Alaska (As of July 1, 2025) $1,040.00 $54,080
California $1,320.00 $68,640.00
Colorado $1,086.25 $56,485.00
Maine $845.21 $43,950.92
New York (NYC, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester Counties) $1,237.50 $64,350.00
New York (other areas) $1,161.65 $60,405.80
Washington (> 50 employees) $1,499.40 $77,968.80
Washington (< 50 employees) $1,332.80 $69,306.56

*In certain states, computer professionals have different overtime exemption levels.

What Can Salaried Employees Do if They Have Been Wrongfully Denied Overtime?

If your employer has not paid you overtime and you earn less than the federal or your state’s salary threshold for overtime exemption, you may have a right to unpaid wages. Employers cannot use the federal salary level as an excuse if state law requires a higher threshold.

If you have not received the wages or overtime pay you are entitled to, acting quickly is essential. Federal and state law wage and overtime claims are subject to strict deadlines, known as statutes of limitations. Missing these deadlines could mean losing your right to recover unpaid earnings.

Under the FLSA, for example, most claims for unpaid wages—including minimum wage and overtime violations—must be filed within two years of the violation. If the employer’s violation was willful, the deadline could extend to three years. The longer you wait, the more of your unpaid wages may become unrecoverable. Understanding your rights and legal time limits ensures you do not miss the chance to claim what you are owed.

If you believe you have a claim for unpaid wages, consider seeking legal guidance as soon as possible. To discuss your rights, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

Smith & Wesson Privacy Class Action Alleges User Data Shared Despite Cookie Rejection

Smith & Wesson Allegedly Violated its Website User Privacy Policy //

On April 4, 2025, a class action lawsuit was filed against Smith & Wesson Inc. in United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 5:25-cv-03085), alleging an “egregious privacy violation and total breach of consumer trust in violation of California law.”

According to the complaint, Smith & Wesson violated its own written website Privacy Policy, which assured users that they could opt out of accepting cookies by selecting the “Reject All” option on the cookie consent banner. ​ The Privacy Policy stated that users could decline cookies and tracking technologies, and that an “Opt-out Cookie” would be placed on their devices to honor this choice.

Despite these assurances, however, Smith & Wesson allegedly caused third-party cookies and software code to be stored on consumers’ devices and transmitted user data (“private communications”) to third parties, even after users clicked the “Reject All” option in the cookie consent banner.

According to the complaint:

Defendant’s [w]ebsite offers consumers a choice to browse without being tracked, followed, and targeted by third party data brokers and advertisers. However, Defendant’s promises are outright lies, designed to lull users into a false sense of security. Even after users elect to ‘Reject All’ cookies, Defendant surreptitiously enables several third parties – including Google LLC (YouTube, DoubleClick and Google Analytics), X Corp. (formerly Twitter), Listrak, Inc. and Lightbox . . . to place and/or transmit cookies that track users’ website browsing activities and eavesdrop on users’ private communications on the [w]ebsite. (Italics and bold added.)

Summary of Smith & Wesson’s Website Privacy Policy 

Smith & Wesson’s Website Privacy Policy made the following representations to users, according to the complaint:

Option to Opt Out of Cookies: Users were assured that they could opt out of accepting cookies altogether by either selecting the “I do not accept Cookies” option on the cookie consent banner upon their initial visit to the website or setting their browser to not accept cookies or to notify them when a cookie is sent, giving them the chance to decide whether to accept it. ​

Placement of an Opt-Out Cookie: The Privacy Policy stated that if users chose to opt out, an “Opt-out Cookie” would be placed on their computer. ​ This cookie would be browser- and device-specific and would last until cookies were cleared from the browser or device. ​

Respect for User Choices: The Privacy Policy represented to users that their choices to reject cookies would be honored, even if certain Smith & Wesson website functions might not work properly as a result.

According to the complaint:

In truth, [the] Defendant did not abide by its users’ wishes despite its promises that it would honor their request to reject cookies. When users clicked the ‘Reject All’ cookies button, they provided notice to Defendant that they did not consent to the placement or transmission of third-party cookies that would allow those parties to obtain their [p]rivate [c]ommunications with the [w]ebsite. Nevertheless, [the] Defendant caused the [t]hird [p]arty tracking cookies to be placed on [w]ebsite users’ browsers and devices and/or transmitted to the [t]hird [p]arties along with user data—even for those users who elected to reject all cookies. (Italics and bold added.)

The privacy caction against Smith & Wesson, among other things, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as full restitution and disgorgement by Defendant Smith & Wesson of wrongfully obtained revenues and profits.

Smith & Wesson Website Users May Have Legal Claims

Smith & Wesson’s website users who have questions about the class action lawsuit or would like to discuss potential legal claims can send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected].

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

 

SEND US A MESSAGE

Contact Us

ADDRESS

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
2001 Market Street
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

PHONE

Tel: 215-792-6676

EMAIL

[email protected]

“SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2025” Intends to Strengthen the SEC Whistleblower Program

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) have reintroduced legislation known as the SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2025, a bipartisan bill aimed at bolstering protections for whistleblowers who report securities violations.

The legislation seeks to shield whistleblowers from retaliation, ensure timely processing of claims, and prevent the waiver of whistleblower rights through pre-dispute arbitration agreements.

“Patriotic whistleblowers root out waste, fraud and abuse taking place in the shadows, and we should thank them for recovering billions of valuable taxpayer dollars. I’m proud to reintroduce this legislation to increase government accountability by safeguarding the SEC’s Whistleblower Program,” Senator Grassley said.

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), another cosponsor, stressed the importance of protecting public servants: “Now more than ever, it’s critical that we protect the brave public servants willing to do what’s right and expose wrongdoing. There is bipartisan agreement that we must strengthen whistleblower protections to ensure they don’t face retaliation for the risks they take.”

Key Provisions of the SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2025

The proposed legislation includes several critical measures to strengthen whistleblower protections:

  • Protection Against Retaliation: Whistleblowers who report violations to their direct superiors would be protected from retaliation. Currently, they are only protected if they report directly to the SEC or certain officials.

  • Timely Claims Processing: The bill ensures that claims and awards are processed in a timely manner, addressing previous years-long backlogs.

  • Preservation of Rights: Whistleblowers would be protected from waiving their rights through pre-dispute arbitration agreements.

SEC Whistleblower Program’s Impact

Since its inception under the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, the SEC Whistleblower Program has proven highly effective, recovering over $6.3 billion in sanctions and returning billions to investors and taxpayers.

In Fiscal Year 2024, the SEC awarded over $255 million to whistleblowers and received over 24,000 whistleblower tips.

Bipartisan Support for the SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2025

The SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2025, reintroduced with bipartisan support, aims to enhance accountability, protect whistleblowers from retaliation, and expedite claims processing, ensuring the SEC’s Whistleblower Program continues to safeguard investors and promote corporate transparency.

How to Report Securities Fraud to the SEC

To report fraud under the SEC Whistleblower Program:

  • Gather Evidence – Collect documents, emails, or records supporting your claim. The SEC values high-quality, original information.
  • Submit a Tip – Use the SEC’s Tips, Complaints and Referrals Portal or Form TCR (Tip, Complaint, or Referral). A properly submitted Form TCR is required for a whistleblower award.
  • Work with an Attorney – An experienced whistleblower attorney can guide you and protect your rights. Whistleblowers wishing to remain anonymous must be represented by an attorney.
  • Stay Updated – The SEC may contact you for additional information or updates on your case. Continued cooperation may maximize award chances.

Determining Whistleblower Awards

The SEC determines award percentages based on several factors:

Factors That May Increase an Award:

  • Significance of Information – More valuable information leads to higher awards.
  • Assistance Provided – Helping SEC staff decipher transactions or provide key evidence can increase awards.
  • Law Enforcement Interest – Reports of ongoing violations harming investors may receive priority.
  • Internal Compliance Participation – While not required, internal reporting can increase award percentages.

Factors That May Decrease an Award:

  • Unreasonable Reporting Delay – Waiting too long to report a violation may reduce the award.
  • Culpability – Whistleblowers involved in misconduct may receive reduced payouts.
  • Interference with Internal Reporting Systems – Undermining internal compliance may lower an award.

Maximum Whistleblower Award Presumption

Under the 2020 Whistleblower Rule Amendments, whistleblowers are presumed eligible for the maximum 30% award if:

  • The total award does not exceed $5 million.
  • The claimant has no negative factors (e.g., culpability or delay).
  • The claim does not involve whistleblowers engaged in misconduct.

In FY 2024, the SEC applied this presumption in 90% of cases where the maximum award was $5 million or less.

Why Report Securities Violations?

By participating in the SEC Whistleblower Program, individuals help combat fraud, hold violators accountable, and protect investors. With over $2.2 billion awarded to 444 whistleblowers since 2011, the program plays a critical role in exposing wrongdoing.

If you have information about securities fraud, consider consulting a legal professional before submitting a tip.

Learn more about the SEC Whistleblower Program by visiting the SEC’s official Whistleblower FAQ page.

Do You Have Questions or Concerns About Whistleblower Reporting of Securities Fraud to the SEC?

Making the decision to come forward as a whistleblower and report securities fraud to the SEC can be challenging. At Kehoe Law Firm, P.C., our legal team understands the complexities involved and has extensive experience investigating fraud, prosecuting wrongdoing, and working with individuals who bravely expose securities violations.

If you have questions about voluntarily providing information to the SEC as a whistleblower—whether regarding eligibility for a whistleblower award, the reporting process, or the required submission format—please send us a message to be contacted by an attorney for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential whistleblower claims.

To speak directly with an attorney, please contact either Michael Yarnoff, Esq., [email protected], [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, or John Kehoe, Esq., [email protected], [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801.

About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Commissions Are Wages Under NJ’s Wage Payment Law

    New Jersey Supreme Court Unanimously Decides Commissions are Wages //

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is informing New Jersey employees that on March 17, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court (the “Court”) unanimously held that “commissions” are “wages” under New Jersey’s Wage Payment Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1-4.15 (“WPL”).

    The WPL, according to the Court, “defines ‘wages’ as ‘direct monetary compensation for labor or services rendered by an employee, where the amount is determined on a time, task, piece, or commission basis.’ N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1(c) (emphasis added).”

    As such, according to the Court, “compensating an employee by paying a ‘commission’ for ‘labor or services’ always constitutes a wage under the WPL. Therefore . . . a ‘commission’ under the WPL cannot be excluded from the definition of ‘wages’ as a ‘supplementary incentive.’

    Key Facts Leading to the Court’s Decision that Commissions are Wages under NJ’s WPL

    The plaintiff, Rosalyn Musker (“Musker”), worked in sales for defendant Suuchi, Inc. (“Suuchi”), a company that sells software subscriptions to apparel manufacturers. Besides her base salary, Musker was eligible for commissions under Suuchi’s Sales Commission Plan (“SCP”).

    In March 2020, Suuchi decided to sell Personal Protective Equipment (“PPE”) on a commission basis, as documented in emails to the company’s sales team. Musker generated approximately $34,448,900 in gross revenue by selling PPE.

    The legal dispute concerned whether the 4% commission Musker was entitled to for the PPE sales was of gross or net revenue, and both sides disagreed about whether Musker’s PPE commissions were “wages” or were excluded from the WPL as “supplementary incentives” under N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1(c).

    Musker filed a complaint which alleged that Suuchi violated the WPL by withholding her “wages.”

    The trial judge dismissed the WPL claims, holding that Musker’s PPE commissions were not “wages” under the WPL; the Appellate Division affirmed; and the Court granted leave to appeal.

    Key Points of The Court’s Opinion Finding Commissions are Wages 

    According to the Court’s opinion syllabus:

    • PPE sales required Musker to render “labor or services” as an employee of Suuchi;
    • There is no dispute that Musker’s compensation for PPE sales was determined on a commission basis;
    • PPE commissions earned by Musker solely because she performed “labor or services” were “wages” under N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1(c);
    • Merely because a product is new and potentially sold only temporarily does not mean that sales of that product in some way fall outside the regular “labor or services” an employee provides;
    • Selling PPE became part of Musker’s job, and her compensation for performing that task remained a “wage” within the meaning of the WPL;
    • Whether PPE compensation is governed by the SCP or the March 2020 emails regarding the sales of PPE, and whether the PPE commissions are based on gross or net revenue, is not relevant to the determination that the commissions are wages; and
    • Receiving a base salary does not turn “commissions” into “supplementary incentives” under the WPL.

    Source: Rosalyn Musker v. Suuchi, Inc. (A-8-24) (089665) 

    New Jersey Employees Who Believe Their Employer Has Withheld or Refused to Pay Commissions

    As the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously decided, under New Jersey’s WPL, commissions are wages.

    If you believe you are a victim of unpaid commissions, you may have legal claims and are encouraged to send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation legal evaluation.

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    Our firm litigates securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

    Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

     

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Vehicle Recalls: Important Consumer Information

    Vehicle Recalls: When is a Safety Recall Required? //

    When your vehicle or motor vehicle equipment poses a safety risk to you, your passengers, or other motorists, it can be recalled.

    • A recall is issued when a manufacturer or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) determines that a vehicle, equipment, car seat, or tire creates an unreasonable safety risk or fails to meet minimum safety standards.
    • Manufacturers are required to fix the problem by repairing it, replacing it, offering a refund, or, in rare cases, repurchasing the vehicle.

    The United States Code for Motor Vehicle Safety (Title 49, Chapter 301) defines motor vehicle safety as “the performance of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment in a way that protects the public against unreasonable risk of accidents occurring because of the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle, and against unreasonable risk of death or injury in an accident, and includes nonoperational safety of a motor vehicle.”

    A defect includes “any defect in performance, construction, a component, or material of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment.”

    Generally, a safety defect is defined as a problem that exists in a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment that:

    • Poses a risk to motor vehicle safety and
    • May exist in a group of vehicles of the same design or manufacture, or items of equipment of the same type and manufacture.

    How Do Vehicle Recalls Affect Owners and Lessees?

    When your vehicle, equipment, car seat, or tire is subject to a recall, a safety defect has been identified that affects you.

    NHTSA monitors each safety recall to make sure owners receive safe, free, and effective remedies from manufacturers according to the Safety Act and federal regulations. If there is a safety recall, your manufacturer will fix the problem free of charge.

    How Do I Know if My Vehicle Has Been Recalled?

    If you have registered your vehicle, your manufacturer will notify you if there’s a safety recall by sending you a letter in the mail. It is important to make sure your vehicle registration is up-to-date, including your current mailing address.

    Vehicle owners and lessees can also sign up to receive from NHTSA e-mail recall notifications affecting your make and model or download the SaferCar mobile app for iPhones or SaferCar mobile app for Androids to have recall alerts sent to your phone.

    Manufacturers are obligated to attempt to notify owners of recalled products.

    For vehicles, this means manufacturers merge their own vehicle purchase records with current state vehicle registration information.

    For equipment, where state registration records do not exist, manufacturers are obligated to notify their distribution chain and known purchasers of the recalled equipment.

    Even if you do not receive a notification, however, if your vehicle, child restraint, or other item of equipment is involved in a safety recall, the manufacturer is obligated to provide a free remedy.

    What Should You Do If Your Vehicle Has Been Recalled?

    When you receive a vehicle recall notification, follow any interim safety guidance provided by the manufacturer and contact your local dealership.

    Whether you receive a recall notification or are subject to a safety improvement campaign, it is very important that you visit your dealer to have the vehicle serviced.

    The dealer will fix the recalled part or portion of your car for free. If a dealer refuses to repair your vehicle in accordance with the recall letter, you should notify the manufacturer immediately.

    How Do You Search for Vehicle Recalls?

    To easily search vehicles, car seats, tires and other equipment for safety recalls, investigations, complaints and manufacturer communication, visit Check for Recalls on the NHTSA website.

    On NHTSA.gov, consumers can search for recalls by:

    The NHTSA also makes recall information searchable by

    How Do You Report a Safety Problem to the NHTSA?

    Consumers who experience a vehicle issue that could be a safety defect can submit a complaint on the NHTSA’s website at Report a Safety Problem or call the NHTSA’s Vehicle Safety Hotline at (888) 327-4236, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. (ET), Hearing Impaired (TTY), (888) 275-9171. 

    Source: Safercar.gov, Vehicle Recalls: FAQs and NHTSA.gov, Resources Related to Investigations and Recalls

    Consumers Affected by Safety Recalls May Have Legal Claims

    Consumers impacted by vehicle defects or safety recalls are encouraged to send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], for a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, 

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors. We litigate securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

    KLF’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

     

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    California Overtime Pay: Know Your Rights & Get Paid Fairly

    California Overtime Pay & Nonexempt Employees //

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is ensuring that California workers know that California overtime pay provisions mandate that nonexempt employees—ages 18 and older, as well as 16- and 17-year-olds who are not required to attend school and are legally permitted to work—cannot be employed for more than eight hours per workday or 40 hours per workweek, unless they receive overtime pay at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours exceeding these limits.

    Eight hours of labor constitutes a day’s work, and employment beyond eight hours in any workday or more than six days in any workweek requires the employee to be compensated for the overtime at not less than:

    • One and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay for all hours worked beyond eight hours up to and including 12 hours in any workday, and for the first eight hours worked on the seventh consecutive day of work in a workweek; and
    • Double the employee’s regular rate of pay for all hours worked beyond 12 hours in any workday and for all hours exceeding eight on the seventh consecutive day of work in a workweek.

    Are there Exemptions from the California Overtime Pay Laws?

    YES. To learn more about the exemptions from California’s overtime pay laws, click here.

    The “Regular Rate of Pay” and Calculating Overtime

    California overtime pay is based on the regular rate of pay, which is the compensation normally earned for the work performed.

    The regular rate of pay includes several different kinds of remuneration, such as hourly earnings, salary, piecework earnings, and commissions.

    The regular rate of pay may not be less than the applicable minimum wage.

    Ordinarily, the hours to be used in computing the regular rate of pay may not exceed the legal maximum regular hours which, in most cases, is 8 hours per workday, 40 hours per workweek.

    The agreed upon regular hours must be used, if they are less than the legal maximum regular hours. For example, if you work 32 to 38 hours each week, there is an agreed average workweek of 35 hours, and thirty-five hours is the figure used to determine the regular rate of pay.

    In circumstances where the workweek is less than 40 hours, however, the law does not require payment of the overtime premium unless the employee works more than eight hours in a workday or more than 40 hours in a workweek.

    Stated differently, assuming you are employed under a policy that provides for a 35-hour workweek, the law does not require the employer to pay the overtime premium until after eight hours in a workday or 40 hours in a workweek.

    If you work more than 35 but fewer than 40 hours in a workweek, you will be entitled to be paid for the extra hours at your regular rate of pay unless you work over eight hours in a workday or 40 hours in a workweek.

    How to Calculate the Regular Rate of Pay

    If you are paid on an hourly basis, that amount, including, among other things, shift differentials and the per hour value of any non-hourly compensation the employee has earned, is the regular rate of pay.

    If you are paid a salary, the regular rate is determined as follows:

    • Multiply the monthly remuneration by 12 (months) to get the annual salary.
    • Divide the annual salary by 52 (weeks) to get the weekly salary.
    • Divide the weekly salary by the number of legal maximum regular hours (40) to get the regular hourly rate.

    If you are paid by the piece or commission, either of the following methods may be used to determine the regular rate of pay for purposes of computing overtime:

    • The piece or commission rate is used as the regular rate and you are paid one and one-half this rate for production during the first four overtime hours in a workday, and double time for all hours worked beyond 12 in a workday; or
    • Divide your total earnings for the workweek, including earnings during overtime hours, by the total hours worked during the workweek, including the overtime hours. For each overtime hour worked you are entitled to an additional one-half the regular rate for hours requiring time and one-half, and to the full rate for hours requiring double time.

    A group rate for piece workers is an acceptable method for computing the regular rate of pay. In using this method, the total number of pieces produced by the group is divided by the number of people in the group, with each person being paid accordingly. The regular rate for each worker is determined by dividing the pay received by the number of hours worked. The regular rate cannot be less than the minimum wage.

    If you are paid two or more rates by the same employer during the workweek, the regular rate is the “weighted average” determined by dividing your total earnings for the workweek, including earnings during overtime hours, by the total hours worked during the workweek, including the overtime hours.

    For example, if you work 32 hours at $11.00 an hour and 10 hours during the same workweek at $9.00 an hour, your weighted average (and thus the regular rate for that workweek) is $10.52. This is calculated by adding your $442 straight time pay for the workweek [(32hours x $11.00/hour) + (10 hours x $9.00/hour) = $442] and dividing it by the 42 hours you worked.

    Is an Employer Required to Pay Employees for Unauthorized Overtime?

    YES. California law requires that employers pay overtime, whether authorized or not, at the rate of one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of eight up to and including 12 hours in any workday, and for the first eight hours of work on the seventh consecutive day of work in a workweek, and double the employee’s regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 12 in any workday and for all hours worked in excess of eight on the seventh consecutive day of work in a workweek.

    Is a Bonus Factored into the Regular Rate of Pay when Calculating Overtime?

    YESif it is a nondiscretionary bonus. A nondiscretionary bonus is included in determining the regular rate of pay for computing overtime when the bonus is compensation for hours worked, production or proficiency, or as an incentive to remain employed by the same employer.

    Incentive bonuses include flat sum bonuses. To properly compute overtime on a flat sum bonus, the bonus must be divided by the maximum legal regular hours worked in the bonus-earning period, not by the total hours worked in the bonus-earning period. This calculation will produce the regular rate of pay on the flat sum bonus earnings.

    Overtime on a flat sum bonus must then be paid at 1.5 times or 2 times this regular rate calculation for any overtime hour worked in the bonus-earning period.

    Overtime on production bonuses, bonuses designed as an incentive for increased production for each hour worked are computed differently from flat sum bonuses.

    To compute overtime on a production bonus, the production bonus is divided by the total hours worked in the bonus earning period. This calculation will produce the regular rate of pay on the production bonus.

    Overtime on the production bonus is then paid at .5 times or 1 times the regular rate for all overtime hours worked in the bonus-earning period. Overtime on either type of bonus may be due on either a daily or weekly basis and must be paid in the pay period following the end of the bonus-earning period.

    Discretionary bonuses or sums paid as gifts at a holiday or other special occasion, such as a reward for good service, which are not measured by or dependent upon hours worked, production or efficiency, are not subject to be paid at overtime rates and thus are not included for purposes of determining the regular rate of pay.

    Are any Amounts Excluded from the Regular Rate of Pay?

    YES. Certain types of payments are excluded from the regular rate of pay.

    Examples of some of the more common exclusions are sums paid as gifts for special occasions, expense reimbursements, payments made for occasional periods when no work is performed due to vacation, holiday, illness, failure of the employer to provide sufficient work, premium pay for Saturday, Sunday, or holiday work (where such premium rate is not less than one and one-half times the rate established in good faith for like work performed in non-overtime hours on other days), and discretionary bonuses.

    Are Salaried Employees Entitled to Overtime?

    It depends. A salaried employee must be paid overtime unless they meet the test for exempt status as defined by federal and state laws, or unless they are specifically exempted from overtime by the provisions of the California Labor Code or one of the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders regulating wages, hours and working conditions.

    Can an Employer Require an Employee to Work Overtime?

    YES. Generally, an employer may dictate the employee’s work schedule and hours. Additionally, under most circumstances the employer may discipline an employee, up to and including termination, if the employee refuses to work scheduled overtime.

    An employer, however, cannot discipline an employee for refusing to work on the 7th day in a workweek and is subject to a penalty for causing or inducing an employee to forego a day of rest. An employee who is fully apprised of the entitlement to rest may independently chooses not to take a day of rest.

    Can an Employee Waive His or Her Right to Overtime Pay?

    California law requires that an employee be paid all overtime compensation notwithstanding any agreement to work for a lesser wage. Such an agreement or “waiver” will, therefore, not prevent an employee from recovering the difference between the wages paid the employee and the overtime compensation he or she is entitled to receive.

    Source: State of California, Department of Industrial Relations.

    What Are My Options if My Employer Fails to Pay Overtime Wages?

    If you have not been paid required overtime, you may have legal claims. Our experienced class action attorneys are dedicated to protecting workers’ rights. For a free, no-obligation evaluation of potential legal claims, send us a message or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors and consumers from fraud and misconduct. Our attorneys have served as Lead or Co-Lead Counsel in major securities cases, recovering over $10 billion for institutional and individual investors. We litigate securities fraud, fiduciary breaches, unfair mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust violations, while also representing whistleblowers and advocating for victims of data breaches, consumer fraud, vehicle and product defects, employment law violations, retirement plan mismanagement, and other corporate and business misconduct. With a results-driven approach, we pursue justice and substantial recoveries for those we represent.

    KLF’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning clients are not responsible for any fees or litigation expenses. 

     

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]