Apr 1, 2020 | Securities Class Action Archive
Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Golden Star Resources Ltd. – Investors of Golden Star Resources Who Purchased, Or Otherwise Acquired, GSS Securities Between February 20, 2019 and July 30, 2019, Both Dates Inclusive, Encouraged to Contact Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is making investors aware that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of purchasers of the securities of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (“Golden Star Resources” or the “Company”) (NYSE American: GSS) between February 20, 2019 and July 30, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages for GSS investors under the federal securities laws.
According to the class action lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, the Golden Star Resources defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had insufficient geological and geotechnical data in its Prestea mine; (2) the Company had experienced deficiencies in its operating practices and mining methods including inaccurate long hole drilling and blasting in its Prestea mine; (3) Golden Star Resources did not have the mining flexibility and more measured resources to ensure higher reserve grade; (4) the Company had experienced increased tonnage at much lower grade where it had to supplement some of the production with oxide material; (5) the Company had excessive dilution which drove lower mining rates at the Prestea mine; and (6) as a result, the Golden Star Resources defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. Investors, according to the lawsuit, suffered damages when the true details entered the market.
Investors of Golden Star Resources who purchased, or otherwise acquired, GSS securities during the Class Period and suffered losses are encouraged to contact either Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], or John Kehoe, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801, [email protected], to discuss the class action lawsuit or potential legal claims.
Apr 1, 2020 | Securities Class Action Archive
Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against VMware, Inc. and Certain VMware Officers For Alleged Securities Fraud – VMW Investors Who Purchased, Or Otherwise Acquired, Shares of VMware Between March 30, 2019 and February 27, 2020, Both Dates Inclusive, Encouraged to Contact Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is making investors aware that a class action lawsuit has been filed against VMware, Inc. (“VMware” or the “Company”) (NYSE: VMW) and certain of its officers for alleged securities fraud on behalf of VMware investors who purchased, or otherwise acquired, VMware shares between March 30, 2019 and February 27, 2020 (the “Class Period”).
The class action complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that throughout the Class Period, the VMware Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose that: (1) VMware’s reporting with respect to its backlog of unfilled orders was not in compliance with all relevant accounting and disclosure requirements; (2) the foregoing subjected the Company to a foreseeable risk of heightened regulatory scrutiny and/or investigation; and (3) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On February 27, 2020, post-market and the same day that VMware announced its fourth quarter and full year financial results, VMware issued a press release announcing that the Enforcement Division of the SEC “requested documents and information related to VMware’s backlog and associated accounting and disclosures.”
On this news, VMware’s stock price dropped $15.11 per share, or more than 11%.
VMware investors who purchased, or otherwise acquired, VMW securities during the Class Period and suffered losses are encouraged to contact either Michael Yarnoff, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, [email protected], [email protected], or John Kehoe, Esq., (215) 792-6676, Ext. 801, [email protected], to discuss the class action lawsuit or potential legal claims.
Apr 1, 2020 | Consumer Protection, Employment & Technology Archive
Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. Is Making Consumers Aware of Recent Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Lighthouse Insurance Group, LLC
Class action filed in United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, against Lighthouse Insurance Group, LLC. According to the complaint, Lighthouse Insurance Group “repeatedly makes unsolicited autodialed phone calls to consumers’ telephones including cellular telephones all without any prior express consent to make such calls.” The Plaintiffs, allegedly, received unsolicited calls from (252) 388-8025, (252) 562-9338, and (513) 348-1282.
Albertsons Companies, Inc., d/b/a Vons Pharmacy
Class action filed in United States District Court, Southern District of California, against Albertsons Companies, Inc., d/b/a Vons Pharmacy and other defendants, as of yet unknown. The Plaintiff, allegedly, was contacted on her cell phone without her “prior express consent” by Albertsons Companies, d/b/a Vons Pharmacy, “in an effort to sell or solicit [Defendant’s] services.”
Good Chemistry I, LLC
Class action filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Good Chemistry I, LLC. According to the complaint, Good Chemistry I sent unsolicited telemarketing text messages to the cellular telephones of consumers. The Plaintiff, allegedly, “participates in Good Chemistry’s Loyalty Program. However, Plaintiff has never provided his prior express consent to Good Chemistry to receive text messages soliciting him to purchase its products and services.” The Plaintiff, according to the complaint, received the following text messages from Good Chemistry I:
On or around March 16, 2020, at 4:27 p.m., Plaintiff received an unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Take advantage of online ordering at Good Chemistry for express, in-store pickup. Click the link below to start your order. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://ash3.co/gC4XbnZZkc08”.
On March 18, 2020, at 11:09 a.m., Plaintiff received another unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Personal reservations and online ordering are now available at Good Chemistry for express shopping at all locations. Click the link below to learn more. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://y6jk.co/gC6jkeMrth62”.
Later, on March 18, 2020, at 5:33 p.m., Plaintiff received yet another unsolicited text message to his cellular telephone from Good Chemistry from the telephone number (202) 866-2757, which read, “Starting 3/19 updated Good Chemistry hours + other steps we are taking to provide you the fastest, easiest and healthiest access. Click the link below to learn more. Reply STOP WS54 to cancel https://y6jk.co/gC6yjoKWWnS9”.
A1 Diabetes & Medical Supply, Inc.
Class action filed in United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee against A1 Diabetes & Medical Supply, Inc. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff’s cell phone received autodialed calls, voicemails, and text messages from telephone numbers (620) 951-5146, (901) 472-2903, (888) 996-0469, (501) 764-3117, (855) 953-0080, (855) 950-0809, (855) 943-0589, and (855) 964-0793. The Plaintiff, allegedly, never gave his cell phone number to the Defendant, was contacted despite Plaintiff’s request for calls to stop, and did not give consent for A1 Diabetes to call him.
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Class action filed in United States District Court, District of Nevada, against Credit One Bank, N.A. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff “[a]s early as February 10, 2020 . . . began receiving pre-recorded, artificial voice phone calls from [Capital One Bank] on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, soliciting Plaintiff to open a new credit card with [Capital One Bank].” The calls to Plaintiff continued, despite Plaintiff’s alleged attempts to opt out of receiving unsolicited calls from Capital One Bank.
Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
Class action filed in United States District Court, District of New Jersey, against Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff never provided prior express consent to contact her cell phone or her cellular telephone number to Palmer Administrative Services or any of its agents or contractors. The calls Plaintiff received were, allegedly, made in an effort “to solicit Plaintiff and other members of the alleged Class to purchase the auto warranty agreements that Palmer sells, administers, and is a party to.”
Creditors Relief, LLC
Class action filed in United States District Court, District of New Jersey, against Creditors Relief, LLC. According to the complaint, “[i]n or around March 2017, Plaintiff . . . began receiving prerecorded telemarketing calls from Defendant Creditors Relief.” The Plaintiff received calls from telephone number (302) 219-9678, “all placed for the purpose of soliciting [Plaintiff] to purchase Creditors Relief’s debt restructuring services.” Another Plaintiff, allegedly, received calls from Creditors Relief from telephone numbers (737) 702-9272, (424) 213-6470, (747) 223-8773, (760) 304-1136, and (626) 538-2569. According to the complaint, “[a]ll of the calls solicited Plaintiff . . . to purchase Creditors Relief’s debt resolution services.”
Party City Holdings, Inc.
Class action lawsuit filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Party City Holdings, Inc. According to the complaint, the Plaintiff’s cell phone received automated unsolicited marketing text messages from 94467 without Plaintiff’s prior express written consent.
Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC
Class action filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC. According to the complaint, one of the
[Plaintiffs] received a text message from Defendants on December 7, 2019, from the number identified on his caller ID as 657-360-4652. The unsolicited robotext stated: “Congrats Brian! Your code 7SR-K9M2 printed on your last receipt is among 7 we randomly picked for $1,000 Walmart gift card promotion c6rzc.info/lg6RF72BTV87.”
[Plaintiff] replied ‘Stop.’
Defendants sent the unsolicited robotext to [Plaintiff’s] cellular telephone for the purpose of sending [Plaintiff] spam advertisements and promotional offers, via text messages, like those described above.
According to the complaint,
[o]n December 24, 2019, at 9:09 a.m., [another Plaintiff] received an unsolicited robotext message from Defendants from the number identified on her caller ID as 951-391-2478. This unsolicited message stated: “Congrats WAYNE L! Your code R5Z-M9T8 printed on your last receipt is among 7 we randomly picked for $1,000 Walmart gift card promotion n1xrn.info/A9lcOJ4mtGyC.”
Since December 24, 2019 until the present, Defendants have continued to send [Plaintiff] spam advertisements and promotional offers, via unsolicited text messages.
[Plaintiff] received an unsolicited robotext from Defendants purporting to be from Amazon, stating: “FINAL NOTICE: WAYNE L, please review your address details for shipment ID: 7S86J3 HERE: l8cr.xyz/M5GpXbsJCe Sender: AMAZON.”
. . . [Plaintiff] never consented to receive phone calls or text messages from Defendants.
Elavon, Inc. and 7231911 Canada Inc., d/b/a Digitech Payments
Class action filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, against Elavon, Inc. and 7231911 Canada Inc., d/b/a Digitech Payments. According to the complaint, “[t]he Plaintiff received an automated telemarketing call from Digitech Payments on behalf of Elavon on February 12, 2020” from (778) 819-0300.
Do You Believe You Are a Victim of Illegal Robocalls, Text Messages, “Junk” Faxes or Telemarketing Sales Calls?
If you have received illegal robocalls, text messages, “junk” faxes or telemarketing sales calls, you may be able to recover at least $500 for each illegal call, text or fax you received and, possibly, as much as $1,500 for each illegal call, text message or facsimile that was made either willfully or knowingly in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
To help evaluate your potential legal claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, please complete KLF’s confidential Robocall Questionnaire or, if you prefer to speak with an attorney, please complete the form above on the right, e-mail [email protected] or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your potential legal rights.
Mar 31, 2020 | Consumer Protection, Employment & Technology Archive
Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. Is Making Consumers Aware of Recent Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Firmfinder LLC
Class action lawsuit filed on March 30, 2020 against Firmfinder LLC in United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Allegedly, Defendant [Firmfinder] called Plaintiff in 2019 and 2020 from telephone number (954) 518-3298. According to the complaint, telephone number (954) 518-3298 is
a number which upon information and belief was ‘spoofed’ and was not in service. In other words, Defendant [Firmfinder] used technology to change the phone number it used to call Plaintiff so that the number would appear on Plaintiff’s Caller ID as a local 954 area code number. The spoofing of telephone numbers is also consistent with Defendant’s use of an ATDS, as computer software was used to manipulate the way that the call appeared on Plaintiff’s Call[er] ID.
Upon information and belief, the purpose of Defendant’s phone calls was marketing and solicitation.
Schooladvisor, LLC, d/b/a Degreesearch.org
Class action lawsuit filed on March 26, 2020 against Schooladvisor, LLC, d/b/a Degreesearch.org, in United States District Court, Eastern District of California.
According to the complaint, “[i]n an effort to boost DegreeSearch’s business, Defendant utilized bulk text messaging to reach consumers.” According to the complaint, the Plaintiff received the following unsolicited text messages to his cell phone from Schooladvisor, LLC, d/b/a Degreesearch.org:
On February 2, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Plaintiff received an unsolicited text message to his cellphone from Defendant using SMS shortcode 397-96, which read, “$6,195 in school grant $$ could be available if you qualify! View Schools: http://www2.schoolwe.com/r/1ogp9ha0j (CPG, reply stop to remove)”.
On February 10, 2020, at 10:28 AM, Plaintiff received a similar text message from the same shortcode 397-96, which read, “Edwardo, did you get a chance to explore your class options? View matches here – http://www2.schoolwe.com/r/1ow74bt0m (DS, reply stop to remove)”.
On February 13, 2020, at 8:42 AM, Plaintiff received another text message from the same shortcode 397-96, which read, “Get matched to a school in seconds! $6,195 per year to those who qualify. http://www2.schoolwe.com/r/1rheg0r0e (DS, reply stop to remove)”.
On February 14, 2020, at 12:11 PM Plaintiff received a text message from the short code 397-96, which was identical to the February 13th text message. The text message read, “Get matched to a school in seconds! $6,195 per year to those who qualify. http://www2.schoolwe.com/r/1rheg0r0e (DS, reply stop to remove)”.
According to the complaint, the “Plaintiff does not have a relationship with DegreeSearch, never provided his telephone number to DegreeSearch, and never requested that DegreeSearch send text messages to him or offer him its services in any way.”
Do You Believe You Are a Victim of Illegal Robocalls, Text Messages, “Junk” Faxes or Telemarketing Sales Calls?
If you have received illegal robocalls, text messages, “junk” faxes or telemarketing sales calls, you may be able to recover at least $500 for each illegal call, text or fax you received and, possibly, as much as $1,500 for each illegal call, text message or facsimile that was made either willfully or knowingly in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
To help evaluate your potential legal claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, please complete KLF’s confidential Robocall Questionnaire or, if you prefer to speak with an attorney, please complete the form above on the right, e-mail [email protected] or contact Michael Yarnoff, Esq., [email protected], (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your potential legal rights.
