AST SpaceMobile Securities Class Action – ASTS Investors

Did You Purchase or Otherwise Acquire AST SpaceMobile Securities Between March 4, 2025 and July 15, 2026?

A securities class action has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (“AST SpaceMobile” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: ASTS) between March 4, 2025 and July 15, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

The action is captioned Hunter v. AST SpaceMobile, Inc., et al., Case No. 7:26-cv-00378, and was filed on September 14, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland/Odessa Division. The action seeks to recover damages caused by Defendants’ alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

What Does the Complaint Allege?

The complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) AST SpaceMobile’s increasing capital requirements were likely to increase the Company’s debt load and share dilution with greater frequency and at greater scale than Defendants had signaled to investors; (2) Defendants overstated the sufficiency of the Company’s capital and liquidity position to achieve its strategic and business goals; (3) Defendants overstated the durability of AST SpaceMobile’s competitive position in the satellite direct-to-cellular market and, even following the EchoStar Transaction, continued overstating the Company’s competitive position; (4) AST SpaceMobile was experiencing slow user adoption in the U.S. and Japan; and (5) the foregoing was likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company’s business and financial prospects.

ASTS Stock Declines Following Disclosures

The complaint alleges that the truth about AST SpaceMobile’s business and financial prospects emerged through a series of disclosures during the Class Period. On January 6, 2026, Scotiabank downgraded AST SpaceMobile to a “Sell” recommendation, citing, among other things, significant competition from Starlink and evidence of slow user adoption in the U.S. and Japan. AST SpaceMobile’s Class A common stock price fell $11.76 per share, or 12.06%, to close at $85.73 per share on January 7, 2026.

The complaint further alleges that on July 15, 2026, AST SpaceMobile announced its intent to offer another $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2034, with an option to purchase up to an additional $150 million aggregate principal amount of notes. Following the disclosures, AST SpaceMobile’s Class A common stock price fell $11.30 per share, or 17.04%, to close at $55.01 per share on July 16, 2026.

November 13, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff is November 13, 2026. You do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain a member of the proposed class.

AST SpaceMobile Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

If you purchased or otherwise acquired AST SpaceMobile securities between March 4, 2025 and July 15, 2026, inclusive, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form  or send us a message to discuss your potential legal rights.

For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
(215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
[email protected]
[email protected]

    About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

    Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

    SEND US A MESSAGE

    Contact Us

    ADDRESS

    Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
    2001 Market Street
    Suite 2500
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    PHONE

    Tel: 215-792-6676

    EMAIL

    [email protected]

    Dun & Bradstreet Securities Class Action – DNB Investors

    Did You Sell, Exchange, or Hold Dun & Bradstreet (DNB) Stock in Connection with the Clearlake Merger?

    A securities class action has been filed on behalf of former stockholders of Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“D&B” or the “Company”), whose common stock traded on the NYSE under ticker symbol DNB until the merger closed, concerning its $9.15-per-share acquisition by affiliates of Clearlake Capital Group, L.P.

    The proposed class includes D&B stockholders who:

    • Sold D&B common stock in the open market from May 13, 2025 through August 26, 2025, inclusive;
    • Exchanged D&B common stock into the merger; and/or
    • Held D&B common stock as of the May 9, 2025 record date for the special meeting of stockholders and whose shares were voted on, or entitled to vote on, the merger.

    The action is captioned FNY Partners Fund LP, et al. v. Ammerman, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-26258-CMA, and was filed on September 10, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

    What Does the Complaint Allege?

    The complaint alleges that D&B’s May 13, 2025 proxy statement was materially false and misleading. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the proxy statement:

    • Concealed the true genesis of the sale, including Carronade Capital Management’s activist campaign against Cannae Holdings, Inc., the pending proxy contest at Cannae, and William P. Foley II’s alleged plan to sell D&B to return capital to Cannae and its stockholders;
    • Omitted Bank of America valuations of alternatives to a whole-company sale that the complaint alleges were superior to the $9.15 merger price;
    • Falsely stated that D&B’s Board reviewed and approved the downward revisions to the Company’s financial projections; and
    • Failed to disclose alleged conflicts involving D&B’s financial and legal advisors, including longstanding ties between William P. Foley II and Bank of America’s lead banker and attorney, as well as D&B’s outside legal counsel at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.

    The $9.15 Merger Price

    According to the complaint, the $9.15 merger price was 24% below the $12.00-per-share price Clearlake had offered in November 2024 and 33% below the $12.13-per-share analyst consensus price target that prevailed until news of the deal leaked.

    The complaint also alleges that Bank of America valued certain alternatives above the $9.15 merger price, including $11.35 per share for a Reverse Morris Trust, an $11.26-per-share midpoint for a tax-free separation, and a $10.28-per-share midpoint for a “RemainCo” following a segment sale.

    November 10, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

    The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff is November 10, 2026. You do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain a member of the proposed class.

    D&B Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

    If you sold D&B common stock in the open market from May 13, 2025 through August 26, 2025, inclusive; exchanged D&B common stock into the merger; and/or held D&B common stock as of the May 9, 2025 record date for the special meeting of stockholders and your shares were voted on, or entitled to vote on, the merger, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form  or send us a message to discuss your potential legal rights.

    For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

    Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
    (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

      About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

      Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]

      CFTC Whistleblower Awards – Latest Awards Totaling More Than $150 Million

      The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) has granted 10 whistleblower awards totaling more than $150 million.

      According to the CFTC, the final award determinations were issued between July and September 2026. The awards recognize whistleblowers whose original information led the CFTC and other authorities to bring successful enforcement actions.

      The CFTC did not identify the whistleblowers, the underlying enforcement actions, or the exact amount of each award. The agency generally withholds this information to protect whistleblower confidentiality.

      CFTC Whistleblower Awards Reach a Significant Milestone

      The awards underscore the important role whistleblowers can play in identifying conduct that may violate the Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations.

      Since issuing its first whistleblower award in 2014, the CFTC has awarded more than $580 million to whistleblowers. According to the agency, those awards are associated with enforcement actions resulting in more than $5.1 billion in monetary sanctions.

      The CFTC explained that whistleblower awards encourage individuals to report misconduct and can contribute to the success of the agency’s enforcement program.

      Who May Qualify for a CFTC Whistleblower Award?

      Eligible whistleblowers may receive between 10% and 30% of the monetary sanctions collected in a covered CFTC action or qualifying related action. When the CFTC obtains a final judgment or settlement with monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million, the Whistleblower Office posts a Notice of Covered Action, after which whistleblowers who submitted information related to the underlying enforcement action may apply for an award.

      An award is not automatic. In general, a whistleblower must voluntarily provide original information that leads to the successful enforcement of a CFTC action or qualifying related action. For information about conduct already under examination or investigation, the whistleblower’s submission must significantly contribute to the success of the action.

      Under CFTC Rule 165.2(i), detailed standards govern whether original information is considered to have “led to successful enforcement.” Among other circumstances, information concerning conduct not already under examination or investigation may satisfy the standard when it is sufficiently specific, credible, and timely to cause CFTC staff to commence an examination, open or reopen an investigation, or inquire into different conduct, and the CFTC brings a successful action based in whole or in part on conduct that was the subject of the information.

      Information concerning conduct already under examination or investigation may also satisfy the standard when it significantly contributes to the success of the action. The CFTC may also grant an award in connection with an enforcement action brought by another domestic or foreign regulator when the applicable requirements are satisfied.

      Award eligibility, percentage calculations, and related-action requirements are governed by detailed rules. Anyone considering a submission should understand that the timing and manner of reporting may affect potential eligibility.

      What Types of Conduct Can Be Reported?

      The CFTC welcomes information concerning potential wrongdoing affecting the U.S. derivatives markets, including futures, options, and swaps, as well as fraud or manipulation involving commodities in interstate commerce, including certain digital assets.

      Conduct reported to the CFTC may involve, among other things:

      • Fraud involving commodities or derivatives;
      • Market manipulation;
      • Misappropriation of customer funds;
      • False or misleading statements to investors or customers; or
      • Certain fraud or manipulation involving digital assets.

      A person does not have to be a company insider to provide relevant information. Employees, former employees, customers, investors, market professionals, fraud victims, and others may possess information concerning conduct that may fall within the CFTC’s jurisdiction.

      Are CFTC Whistleblowers Protected?

      The Commodity Exchange Act provides confidentiality protections for whistleblowers. The CFTC generally does not disclose information that could reasonably be expected to reveal a whistleblower’s identity, subject to limited exceptions.

      A whistleblower may submit a Form TCR tip anonymously, with or without an attorney. However, a whistleblower who wishes to apply for an award anonymously must be represented by counsel. Before an award is paid, the whistleblower’s identity must be disclosed to the CFTC and verified in a manner acceptable to the Commission.

      Confidentiality protections are not absolute. In certain circumstances, disclosure may be required in connection with an administrative or judicial proceeding or as otherwise permitted by applicable law.

      Individuals concerned about confidentiality, workplace retaliation, or preserving evidence should consider obtaining legal guidance before communicating with an employer, regulator, or other party.

      How Is a CFTC Whistleblower Tip Submitted?

      A person with information about a potential Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC violation may submit a Tip, Complaint, or Referral using the CFTC’s Form TCR.

      The submission should clearly explain the suspected misconduct and, where available, identify supporting documents, communications, transactions, witnesses, and relevant dates.

      Timing can be important. To be treated as voluntarily submitted, information must be provided before the CFTC or certain other authorities request, inquire about, or demand information from the whistleblower relating to the original information being provided.

      Submitting information does not guarantee that the CFTC will open an investigation, bring an enforcement action, collect monetary sanctions, or grant an award.

      Speak With a Whistleblower Attorney

      Individuals with information concerning commodities fraud, market manipulation, financial misconduct, or other conduct that may fall within the CFTC’s jurisdiction may have questions about their reporting options and potential rights under the CFTC Whistleblower Program.

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. assists whistleblowers in evaluating potential claims and navigating issues involving CFTC reporting, award eligibility, confidentiality, anonymity, and timing.

      If you have information that may be relevant to the CFTC Whistleblower Program, contact Kehoe Law Firm to discuss your circumstances and potential options.

      All consultations and case evaluations are free and confidential.

      Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
      (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
      [email protected]
      [email protected]

      About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion on behalf of institutional and individual investors.

      Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

       

       

      SEND US A MESSAGE

      Contact Us

      ADDRESS

      Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
      2001 Market Street
      Suite 2500
      Philadelphia, PA 19103

      PHONE

      Tel: 215-792-6676

      EMAIL

      [email protected]

      Lincoln Educational Securities Class Action | LINC Investors

      Did You Invest in Lincoln Educational (LINC) Between May 11 and August 9, 2026?

      A Lincoln Educational securities class action has been filed against Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (“Lincoln Educational,” “Lincoln,” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LINC) and certain of its officers on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lincoln securities between May 11, 2026 and August 9, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged thereby.

      The action is captioned Bacha v. Lincoln Educational Services Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-11842-MCA-CF, filed on September 11, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

      Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lincoln Educational securities between May 11, 2026 and August 9, 2026 may have legal rights and are encouraged to contact Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. to discuss their legal rights without cost or obligation.

      What Does the Lincoln Educational Securities Class Action Allege?

      The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, the defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts concerning Lincoln Educational’s business, operations, and prospects.

      Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants failed to disclose that: Lincoln Educational’s admissions process was not effectively converting students from enrollment to start; the Company was experiencing a significant drop in student starts relative to enrollment; and, as a result, the defendants’ positive statements about Lincoln’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

      Lincoln’s August 10, 2026 Disclosures

      On August 10, 2026, before the market opened, Lincoln reported earnings for the second quarter of 2026. The Company reported that student starts increased only approximately 1% year over year, despite enrollment growing approximately 9%, “as fewer enrolled students than expected attended the first day of class.”Lincoln further disclosed that “during the quarter, [it] observed changes in the student decision-making process that affected conversion from enrollment to start.”

      During the accompanying earnings call, Lincoln’s Chief Financial Officer, Brian Meyers, stated that “a lower percentage have converted to starts” and that “the lower start volume contributed to a higher cost per start.”

      LINC Stock Drop After the Q2 2026 Results

      Following these disclosures, Lincoln’s stock price fell $10.22, or 24.93%, to close at $30.77 per share on August 10, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

      November 10, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

      Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by November 10, 2026. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain potential members of the proposed class or to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

      Lincoln Educational Investors: Contact Kehoe Law Firm

      If you purchased or otherwise acquired Lincoln Educational securities between May 11, 2026 and August 9, 2026, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form  or send us a message to discuss your potential legal rights.

      For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

      Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
      (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
      [email protected]
      [email protected]

        About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

        Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

        Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

        SEND US A MESSAGE

        Contact Us

        ADDRESS

        Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
        2001 Market Street
        Suite 2500
        Philadelphia, PA 19103

        PHONE

        Tel: 215-792-6676

        EMAIL

        [email protected]

        Avis Stock Manipulation Class Acton – CAR Investors

        Avis Stock Manipulation Class Action 

        Investors who suffered losses from trading Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAR) securities between February 20, 2026 and April 21, 2026 may have legal rights.

        Pentwater Accused of Manipulating Avis Securities

        A securities class action alleges that Pentwater Capital Management LP, MCH PWCM Holdings, Inc., and Matthew C. Halbower manipulated the market for Avis Budget Group, Inc. (“Avis”) securities through an alleged short-squeeze scheme. Avis is not named as a defendant in the September 10, 2026 complaint.

        The action is captioned Arjang v. Pentwater Capital Management LP, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-07884, filed September 10, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

        The complaint seeks to represent persons and entities, other than the defendants, that between February 20, 2026 and April 21, 2026, inclusive, (1) purchased or otherwise acquired Avis securities, including purchasers or acquirers of swaps and those who bought Avis common stock to cover a short position, or (2) sold Avis securities short, including sellers of calls who then purchased similar contracts to cover.

        What Does the Complaint Allege?

        According to the complaint, Pentwater was Avis’s second-largest shareholder, holding approximately 8.4% of Avis’s outstanding stock as of June 30, 2025. The complaint alleges that the defendants devised a plan to manipulate the market by buying a significant number of Avis shares while the stock was heavily shorted, generating a short squeeze.

        The complaint alleges that the resulting rapid price increase forced short sellers to close their positions by purchasing additional Avis shares, creating a feedback loop that placed further upward pressure on the stock price. It further alleges that Pentwater rapidly increased its Avis holdings during this period, despite no significant change in Avis’s fundamentals that would justify the increase.

        On February 24, 2026, Pentwater disclosed that it had increased its Avis stake to more than 10%, with 3,562,100 shares as of February 20, 2026. By April 7, 2026, Pentwater reported holding more than 7.8 million Avis shares, representing approximately 22.2% of the Company’s outstanding shares.

        Avis Shares Rise Sharply Before Pentwater’s Alleged Selloff

        The complaint alleges that Avis shares closed at $92.90 on February 25, 2026 and then rose to $713.97 on April 21, 2026, an increase of approximately 668.5% in less than two months.

        According to the complaint, Pentwater then sold approximately 4.3 million Avis shares on April 22 and April 23, 2026, realizing gains of approximately $1.75 billion. Avis shares closed at $229.14 on April 23, a decline of approximately $484.83, or nearly 68%, from the April 21 closing price.

        The complaint alleges that the defendants’ conduct caused losses to investors and other market participants who engaged in transactions covered by the proposed Class, including purchasers of Avis securities and certain investors with short positions.

        September 29, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

        Investors who wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must do so by September 29, 2026. Investors do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to remain potential members of the proposed class or to be eligible to share in any potential recovery.

        Traded Avis Securities During the Class Period? Contact Kehoe Law Firm

        If you purchased or otherwise acquired Avis securities, bought Avis common stock to cover a short position, or engaged in other transactions described in the complaint between February 20, 2026 and April 21, 2026 and suffered financial losses, you are encouraged to complete Kehoe Law Firm’s confidential Stockholder Information Request Form  or send us a message to discuss your potential legal rights.

        For a free, no-obligation legal evaluation, contact:

        Michael Yarnoff, Esq.
        (215) 792-6676, Ext. 804
        [email protected]
        [email protected]

          About Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.

          Kehoe Law Firm, P.C. is a nationally recognized, plaintiff-side class action law firm representing investors, consumers, and employees in matters involving securities fraud, corporate misconduct, mergers and acquisitions, antitrust violations, whistleblower claims, data breaches, consumer fraud, employment law violations, and retirement-plan mismanagement. Its attorneys have served as lead or co-lead counsel in major securities cases, recovering more than $10 billion for institutional and individual investors.

          Kehoe Law Firm’s class action legal services are provided on a contingency-fee basis, meaning plaintiffs are not responsible for attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses. Any request for attorneys’ fees and expenses will be subject to court approval.

          SEND US A MESSAGE

          Contact Us

          ADDRESS

          Kehoe Law Firm, P.C.
          2001 Market Street
          Suite 2500
          Philadelphia, PA 19103

          PHONE

          Tel: 215-792-6676

          EMAIL

          [email protected]